一. 爲何SimpleDateFormat不是線程安全的?java
Java源碼以下:安全
一. 爲何SimpleDateFormat不是線程安全的?ide
Java源碼以下:工具
/**
* Date formats are not synchronized.
* It is recommended to create separate format instances for each thread.
* If multiple threads access a format concurrently, it must be synchronized
* externally.
*/
public class SimpleDateFormat extends DateFormat {
public Date parse(String text, ParsePosition pos){
calendar.clear(); // Clears all the time fields
// other logic ...
Date parsedDate = calendar.getTime();
}
}
abstract class DateFormat{
// other logic ...
protected Calendar calendar;
public Date parse(String source) throws ParseException{
ParsePosition pos = new ParsePosition(0);
Date result = parse(source, pos);
if (pos.index == 0)
throw new ParseException("Unparseable date: \"" + source + "\"" ,
pos.errorIndex);
return result;
}
}性能
若是咱們把SimpleDateFormat定義成static成員變量,那麼多個thread之間會共享這個sdf對象, 因此Calendar對象也會共享。.net
假定線程A和線程B都進入了parse(text, pos) 方法, 線程B執行到calendar.clear()後,線程A執行到calendar.getTime(), 那麼就會有問題。線程
二. 問題重現:orm
public class SdfThreadTest2{
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
final SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
final String[] date = new String[]{"2017-01-01","2017-02-02","2017-03-03","2017-04-04","2017-05-05",
"2017-06-06","2017-07-07","2017-08-08","2017-09-09","2017-10-10","2017-11-11","2017-12-12"};
final ExecutorService es2 = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(12);
for(int i=0;i<12;i++){
final int j = i;
es2.execute(new Runnable(){對象
@Override
public void run() {
try {
System.out.println(j+ "->" + sdf.parse((date[j])));
} catch (ParseException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
});
}
}
}ip
三. 解決方案:
1. 解決方案a:
將SimpleDateFormat定義成局部變量:
SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMM-yyyy", Locale.US);
String str1 = "01-Jan-2010";
String str2 = sdf.format(sdf.parse(str1));
缺點:每調用一次方法就會建立一個SimpleDateFormat對象,方法結束又要做爲垃圾回收。
2. 解決方案b:
加一把線程同步鎖:synchronized(lock)
public class SdfThreadTest2{
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
final SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
final String[] date = new String[]{"2017-01-01","2017-02-02","2017-03-03","2017-04-04","2017-05-05",
"2017-06-06","2017-07-07","2017-08-08","2017-09-09","2017-10-10","2017-11-11","2017-12-12"};
final ExecutorService es2 = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(12);
for(int i=0;i<12;i++){
final int j = i;
es2.execute(new Runnable(){
@Override
public void run() {
try {
synchronized(sdf){
System.out.println(j+ "->" + sdf.parse((date[j])));
}
} catch (ParseException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
});
}
}
}
缺點:性能較差,每次都要等待鎖釋放後其餘線程才能進入
3. 解決方案c: (推薦)
使用ThreadLocal: 每一個線程都將擁有本身的SimpleDateFormat對象副本。
寫一個工具類:
public class DateUtil {
private static ThreadLocal<SimpleDateFormat> local = new ThreadLocal<SimpleDateFormat>();
public static Date parse(String str) throws Exception { SimpleDateFormat sdf = local.get(); if (sdf == null) { sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMM-yyyy", Locale.US); local.set(sdf); } return sdf.parse(str); } public static String format(Date date) throws Exception { SimpleDateFormat sdf = local.get(); if (sdf == null) { sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMM-yyyy", Locale.US); local.set(sdf); } return sdf.format(date); } }