java 面試題

時間 2019-12-24

標籤 java 面試欄目 Java 简体版

原文原文鏈接

一. LinkedList 與 ArrayList 的區別?

1.從插入速度來講，LinkedList只是改變last和next的引用，而ArrayList須要按期判斷空間是否須要擴容，須要擴容的時候，調用Array.copyOf整個複製，因此當數據量大的時候，LinkedList的插入速度明顯要比ArrayList快不少。html

ArrayList:java

public boolean add(E e) {
        ensureCapacityInternal(size + 1);  // Increments modCount!!
        elementData[size++] = e;
        return true;
}
private void ensureCapacityInternal(int minCapacity) {
        if (elementData == EMPTY_ELEMENTDATA) {
            minCapacity = Math.max(DEFAULT_CAPACITY, minCapacity);
        }

        ensureExplicitCapacity(minCapacity);
}
private void ensureExplicitCapacity(int minCapacity) {
        modCount++;

        // overflow-conscious code
        if (minCapacity - elementData.length > 0)
            grow(minCapacity);
}
private void grow(int minCapacity) {
        // overflow-conscious code
        int oldCapacity = elementData.length;
        int newCapacity = oldCapacity + (oldCapacity >> 1);
        if (newCapacity - minCapacity < 0)
            newCapacity = minCapacity;
        if (newCapacity - MAX_ARRAY_SIZE > 0)
            newCapacity = hugeCapacity(minCapacity);
        // minCapacity is usually close to size, so this is a win:
        elementData = Arrays.copyOf(elementData, newCapacity);
}

LinkedList:node

public boolean add(E e) {
        linkLast(e);
        return true;
}
void linkLast(E e) {
        final Node<E> l = last;
        final Node<E> newNode = new Node<>(l, e, null);
        last = newNode;
        if (l == null)
            first = newNode;
        else
            l.next = newNode;
        size++;
        modCount++;
}

2.從刪除速度來講，LinkedList也只是改變了prev 和 next 的引用，因此理論上來講，速度要快一些,linux

而ArrayList須要將數組移位。浪費了不少的時間面試

ArrayList:數組

//刪除
//首先有個rangeCheck判斷，判斷是否超過座標
//其次將數組移位
//而後將要刪除的位置置空
//返回刪除的value
public E remove(int index) {
        rangeCheck(index);

        modCount++;
        E oldValue = elementData(index);

        int numMoved = size - index - 1;
        if (numMoved > 0)
            System.arraycopy(elementData, index+1, elementData, index,
                             numMoved);
        elementData[--size] = null; // clear to let GC do its work

        return oldValue;
    }

LinkedList:安全

//刪除
    public E remove(int index) {
        checkElementIndex(index);
        return unlink(node(index));
    }
//檢索要刪除的node
    Node<E> node(int index) {
        // assert isElementIndex(index);

        if (index < (size >> 1)) {
            Node<E> x = first;
            for (int i = 0; i < index; i++)
                x = x.next;
            return x;
        } else {
            Node<E> x = last;
            for (int i = size - 1; i > index; i--)
                x = x.prev;
            return x;
        }
    }
//更改引用
    E unlink(Node<E> x) {
        // assert x != null;
        final E element = x.item;
        final Node<E> next = x.next;
        final Node<E> prev = x.prev;

        if (prev == null) {
            first = next;
        } else {
            prev.next = next;
            x.prev = null;
        }

        if (next == null) {
            last = prev;
        } else {
            next.prev = prev;
            x.next = null;
        }

        x.item = null;
        size--;
        modCount++;
        return element;
    }

3.從檢索來說，ArrayList直接經過索引來檢索，效率更高，而LinkedList須要把數組分隔，而後判斷是從開始找或者從末尾找，效率要比ArrayList低。工具

ArrayList:學習

/**
     * Returns the element at the specified position in this list.
     *
     * @param  index index of the element to return
     * @return the element at the specified position in this list
     * @throws IndexOutOfBoundsException {@inheritDoc}
     */
    public E get(int index) {
        rangeCheck(index);

        return elementData(index);
    }

LinkedList:優化

/**
     * Returns the element at the specified position in this list.
     *
     * @param index index of the element to return
     * @return the element at the specified position in this list
     * @throws IndexOutOfBoundsException {@inheritDoc}
     */
    public E get(int index) {
        checkElementIndex(index);
        return node(index).item;
    }

二. HashMap 與 Hashtable 的區別?

1.從插入速度來講 Hashtable要比HashMap要慢，由於Hashtable是加同步鎖的，安全的map，HashMap是非安全的

HashMap:

//非同步put
public V put(K key, V value) {
        if (table == EMPTY_TABLE) {
            inflateTable(threshold);
        }
        if (key == null)
            return putForNullKey(value);
        int hash = hash(key);
        int i = indexFor(hash, table.length);
        for (Entry<K,V> e = table[i]; e != null; e = e.next) {
            Object k;
            if (e.hash == hash && ((k = e.key) == key || key.equals(k))) {
                V oldValue = e.value;
                e.value = value;
                e.recordAccess(this);
                return oldValue;
            }
        }

        modCount++;
        addEntry(hash, key, value, i);
        return null;
    }

HashTable:

public synchronized V put(K key, V value) {
        // Make sure the value is not null
        if (value == null) {
            throw new NullPointerException();
        }

        // Makes sure the key is not already in the hashtable.
        Entry tab[] = table;
        int hash = hash(key);
        int index = (hash & 0x7FFFFFFF) % tab.length;
        for (Entry<K,V> e = tab[index] ; e != null ; e = e.next) {
            if ((e.hash == hash) && e.key.equals(key)) {
                V old = e.value;
                e.value = value;
                return old;
            }
        }

        modCount++;
        if (count >= threshold) {
            // Rehash the table if the threshold is exceeded
            rehash();

            tab = table;
            hash = hash(key);
            index = (hash & 0x7FFFFFFF) % tab.length;
        }

        // Creates the new entry.
        Entry<K,V> e = tab[index];
        tab[index] = new Entry<>(hash, key, value, e);
        count++;
        return null;
    }

2.從刪除速度來講，Hashtable要比HashMap要慢，由於Hashtable是加同步鎖的，安全的map，HashMap是非安全的

HashMap:

public V remove(Object key) {
        Entry<K,V> e = removeEntryForKey(key);
        return (e == null ? null : e.value);
}

HashTable:

public synchronized V remove(Object key) {
        Entry tab[] = table;
        int hash = hash(key);
        int index = (hash & 0x7FFFFFFF) % tab.length;
        for (Entry<K,V> e = tab[index], prev = null ; e != null ; prev = e, e = e.next) {
            if ((e.hash == hash) && e.key.equals(key)) {
                modCount++;
                if (prev != null) {
                    prev.next = e.next;
                } else {
                    tab[index] = e.next;
                }
                count--;
                V oldValue = e.value;
                e.value = null;
                return oldValue;
            }
        }
        return null;
}

3.從查詢速度來講，Hashtable要比HashMap要慢，由於Hashtable是加同步鎖的，安全的map，HashMap是非安全的

HashMap:

public V get(Object key) {
        if (key == null)
            return getForNullKey();
        Entry<K,V> entry = getEntry(key);

        return null == entry ? null : entry.getValue();
}
final Entry<K,V> getEntry(Object key) {
        if (size == 0) {
            return null;
        }

        int hash = (key == null) ? 0 : hash(key);
        for (Entry<K,V> e = table[indexFor(hash, table.length)];
             e != null;
             e = e.next) {
            Object k;
            if (e.hash == hash &&
                ((k = e.key) == key || (key != null && key.equals(k))))
                return e;
        }
        return null;
}

HashTable:

public synchronized V get(Object key) {
        Entry tab[] = table;
        int hash = hash(key);
        int index = (hash & 0x7FFFFFFF) % tab.length;
        for (Entry<K,V> e = tab[index] ; e != null ; e = e.next) {
            if ((e.hash == hash) && e.key.equals(key)) {
                return e.value;
            }
        }
        return null;
}