轉自:http://www.blogjava.net/mstar/archive/2013/04/24/398351.htmlhtml
Atomic 從JDK5開始, java.util.concurrent包裏提供了不少面向併發編程的類. 使用這些類在多核CPU的機器上會有比較好的性能.
主要緣由是這些類裏面大多使用(失敗-重試方式的)樂觀鎖而不是synchronized方式的悲觀鎖.
1. incrementAndGet的實現java
public final int incrementAndGet() { for (;;) { int current = get(); int next = current + 1; if (compareAndSet(current, next)) return next; } }
首先能夠看到他是經過一個無限循環(spin)直到increment成功爲止.
循環的內容是
1.取得當前值
2.計算+1後的值
3.若是當前值還有效(沒有被)的話設置那個+1後的值
4.若是設置沒成功(當前值已經無效了即被別的線程改過了), 再從1開始.
2. compareAndSet的實現編程
public final boolean compareAndSet(int expect, int update) { return unsafe.compareAndSwapInt(this, valueOffset, expect, update); }
直接調用的是UnSafe這個類的compareAndSwapInt方法
全稱是sun.misc.Unsafe. 這個類是Oracle(Sun)提供的實現. 能夠在別的公司的JDK裏就不是這個類了
3. compareAndSwapInt的實現
windows
/** * Atomically update Java variable to <tt>x</tt> if it is currently * holding <tt>expected</tt>. * @return <tt>true</tt> if successful */ public final native boolean compareAndSwapInt(Object o, long offset, int expected, int x);
能夠看到, 不是用Java實現的, 而是經過JNI調用操做系統的原生程序.
4. compareAndSwapInt的native實現
若是你下載了OpenJDK的源代碼的話在hotspot\src\share\vm\prims\目錄下能夠找到unsafe.cpp
多線程
UNSAFE_ENTRY(jboolean, Unsafe_CompareAndSwapInt(JNIEnv *env, jobject unsafe, jobject obj, jlong offset, jint e, jint x)) UnsafeWrapper("Unsafe_CompareAndSwapInt"); oop p = JNIHandles::resolve(obj); jint* addr = (jint *) index_oop_from_field_offset_long(p, offset); return (jint)(Atomic::cmpxchg(x, addr, e)) == e; UNSAFE_END
能夠看到實際上調用Atomic類的cmpxchg方法.
5. Atomic的cmpxchg
這個類的實現是跟操做系統有關, 跟CPU架構也有關, 若是是windows下x86的架構
實如今hotspot\src\os_cpu\windows_x86\vm\目錄的atomic_windows_x86.inline.hpp文件裏
架構
inline jint Atomic::cmpxchg (jint exchange_value, volatile jint* dest, jint compare_value) { // alternative for InterlockedCompareExchange int mp = os::is_MP(); __asm { mov edx, dest mov ecx, exchange_value mov eax, compare_value LOCK_IF_MP(mp) cmpxchg dword ptr [edx], ecx } }
在這裏能夠看到是用嵌入的彙編實現的, 關鍵CPU指令是 cmpxchg
到這裏無法再往下找代碼了. 也就是說CAS的原子性其實是CPU實現的. 其實在這一點上仍是有排他鎖的. 只是比起用synchronized, 這裏的排他時間要短的多. 因此在多線程狀況下性能會比較好.
代碼裏有個alternative for InterlockedCompareExchange
這個InterlockedCompareExchange是WINAPI裏的一個函數, 作的事情和上面這段彙編是同樣的
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms683560%28v=vs.85%29.aspx併發
AtomicInteger的源碼說明app
/** 內部使用一個int字段用來表示一個value值,藉助compareAndSwap實現原子更新 **/ public class AtomicInteger extends Number implements java.io.Serializable { private static final long serialVersionUID = 6214790243416807050L; // setup to use Unsafe.compareAndSwapInt for updates private static final Unsafe unsafe = Unsafe.getUnsafe(); private static final long valueOffset; static { try { //這個值標示了value在對象中的位置,compareAndSet的時候會使用到這個值 valueOffset = unsafe.objectFieldOffset (AtomicInteger.class.getDeclaredField("value")); } catch (Exception ex) { throw new Error(ex); } } private volatile int value; /** * Creates a new AtomicInteger with the given initial value. * * @param initialValue the initial value */ public AtomicInteger(int initialValue) { value = initialValue; } /** * Creates a new AtomicInteger with initial value {@code 0}. */ public AtomicInteger() { } /** * Gets the current value. * * @return the current value */ public final int get() { return value; } /** * Sets to the given value. * * @param newValue the new value */ public final void set(int newValue) { value = newValue; } /** * Eventually sets to the given value. * * @param newValue the new value * @since 1.6 */ public final void lazySet(int newValue) { //這裏直接給內存位置賦值,不須要設置內存屏蔽,在某些狀況下效率高 unsafe.putOrderedInt(this, valueOffset, newValue); } /** * Atomically sets to the given value and returns the old value. * * @param newValue the new value * @return the previous value */ public final int getAndSet(int newValue) { for (;;) { int current = get(); if (compareAndSet(current, newValue)) return current; } } /** * Atomically sets the value to the given updated value * if the current value {@code ==} the expected value. * * @param expect the expected value * @param update the new value * @return true if successful. False return indicates that * the actual value was not equal to the expected value. */ public final boolean compareAndSet(int expect, int update) { return unsafe.compareAndSwapInt(this, valueOffset, expect, update); } /** * Atomically sets the value to the given updated value * if the current value {@code ==} the expected value. * * <p>May <a href="package-summary.html#Spurious">fail spuriously</a> * and does not provide ordering guarantees, so is only rarely an * appropriate alternative to {@code compareAndSet}. * * @param expect the expected value * @param update the new value * @return true if successful. */ public final boolean weakCompareAndSet(int expect, int update) { return unsafe.compareAndSwapInt(this, valueOffset, expect, update); } /** * Atomically increments by one the current value. * * @return the previous value */ public final int getAndIncrement() { for (;;) { int current = get(); int next = current + 1; if (compareAndSet(current, next)) return current; } } /** * Atomically decrements by one the current value. * * @return the previous value */ public final int getAndDecrement() { for (;;) { int current = get(); int next = current - 1; if (compareAndSet(current, next)) return current; } } /** * Atomically adds the given value to the current value. * * @param delta the value to add * @return the previous value */ public final int getAndAdd(int delta) { for (;;) { int current = get(); int next = current + delta; if (compareAndSet(current, next)) return current; } } /** * Atomically increments by one the current value. * * @return the updated value */ public final int incrementAndGet() { for (;;) { int current = get(); int next = current + 1; if (compareAndSet(current, next)) return next; } } /** * Atomically decrements by one the current value. * * @return the updated value */ public final int decrementAndGet() { for (;;) { int current = get(); int next = current - 1; if (compareAndSet(current, next)) return next; } } /** * Atomically adds the given value to the current value. * * @param delta the value to add * @return the updated value */ public final int addAndGet(int delta) { for (;;) { int current = get(); int next = current + delta; if (compareAndSet(current, next)) return next; } } /** * Returns the String representation of the current value. * @return the String representation of the current value. */ public String toString() { return Integer.toString(get()); } public int intValue() { return get(); } public long longValue() { return (long)get(); } public float floatValue() { return (float)get(); } public double doubleValue() { return (double)get(); }
關於lazySet的說明: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1468007/atomicinteger-lazyset-vs-setide