在這篇文章中,咱們來聊一下線程的生命週期。java
線程是操做系統中的一個概念,在Java中,它是實現併發程序的主要手段。編程
Java中的線程,本質上就是操做系統中的線程。多線程
操做系統中的線程有「生老病死」,專業說法就是生命週期,雖然不一樣的開發語言對於操做系統的線程作了不一樣的封裝,可是對於線程生命週期來講,基本上是大同小異的。併發
咱們在學習線程的生命週期時,只要能理解生命週期中各個節點的狀態轉換機制就能夠了。socket
操做系統中的線程有5種狀態,能夠用下面的圖進行描述,該圖也被稱爲五態模型。
tcp
線程的五種狀態描述以下:編程語言
Java中的線程生命週期,基於操做系統的線程生命週期進行了定製,它包括六種狀態:工具
Java中的線程生命週期能夠用下圖來描述。
oop
和操做系統線程生命週期相比,Java中的線程生命週期主要有如下2個改動:學習
Java線程狀態中的阻塞、無時限等待和有時限等待能夠理解爲線程致使休眠狀態的三種緣由,咱們來看一下這些狀態之間是怎麼轉換的。
在Java中,只有一種狀況會出現這種狀態轉換:線程等待synchronized隱式鎖。synchronized修飾的方法、代碼塊同一時刻只容許一個線程執行,其餘線程只能等待,在這種狀況下,等待的線程會從運行狀態轉換到阻塞狀態,而當等待的線程得到synchronized鎖後,狀態會從阻塞狀態轉換爲運行狀態。
線程調用阻塞式API時,會切換到阻塞狀態嗎?
在操做系統層面,線程是會切換到休眠狀態的,可是在JVM層面,Java線程的狀態不會切換,也就說Java線程依然是運行狀態。JVM不關心操做系統調度相關的狀態。在JVM看來,等待CPU使用權和等待I/O沒有區別,都是在等待某個資源,因此都屬於可運行/運行狀態。
咱們平時說的Java調用阻塞式API時,線程會被阻塞,咱們指的是操做系統線程狀態,而不是Java線程狀態,這一點須要分清楚。
如下三種狀況會觸發運行狀態和無時限等待狀態的切換。
有時限等待和無時限等待的主要區別,在於觸發條件中添加了超時參數。
如下五種狀況會觸發運行狀態和有時限等待狀態的切換。
Java剛建立出來的Thread對象就是初始化狀態,有兩種能夠建立線程的方法:
初始化狀態的線程,並不會被操做系統調度,所以不會被執行。在調用線程對象的start()方法後,線程就會從初始化狀態切換到運行狀態。
線程在如下兩種狀況時會自動切換到終止狀態:
咱們有2種方法終止線程:
咱們不推薦使用stop()方法,在JDK中,它已經被標記爲Deprecated。咱們推薦使用interrupt()方法來終止線程。
stop()方法和interrupt()方法的區別:
被調用了interrupt()方法的線程,有如下2種方式接收通知:
在查看了Java線程生命週期中的狀態以及狀態之間的切換後,咱們來使用jstack來查看一下真實運行的線程的狀態。
咱們以一個死鎖的程序爲例,來講明如何使用jstack。
咱們在解釋互斥鎖和死鎖的時候,寫了一些死鎖示例,代碼以下。
public class BankTransferDemo { public void transfer(BankAccount sourceAccount, BankAccount targetAccount, double amount) { synchronized(sourceAccount) { synchronized(targetAccount) { if (sourceAccount.getBalance() > amount) { System.out.println("Start transfer."); System.out.println(String.format("Before transfer, source balance:%s, target balance:%s", sourceAccount.getBalance(), targetAccount.getBalance())); sourceAccount.setBalance(sourceAccount.getBalance() - amount); targetAccount.setBalance(targetAccount.getBalance() + amount); System.out.println(String.format("After transfer, source balance:%s, target balance:%s", sourceAccount.getBalance(), targetAccount.getBalance())); } } } } }
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException { BankAccount sourceAccount = new BankAccount(); sourceAccount.setId(1); sourceAccount.setBalance(50000); BankAccount targetAccount = new BankAccount(); targetAccount.setId(2); targetAccount.setBalance(20000); BankTransferDemo obj = new BankTransferDemo(); Thread t1 = new Thread(() ->{ for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { obj.transfer(sourceAccount, targetAccount, 1); } }); Thread t2 = new Thread(() ->{ for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { obj.transfer(targetAccount, sourceAccount, 1); } }); t1.start(); t2.start(); t1.join(); t2.join(); System.out.println("Finished."); }
上述代碼在運行過程當中,由於資源爭搶的緣由,最後會進入死鎖狀態,下面咱們來看一下如何使用jstack來獲取具體信息。
(base) ➜ ~ jstack -l 63044
請注意上述的63044
是運行的pid,運行程序屢次產生的pid是不同的。
jstack的返回結果以下。
2021-01-15 19:56:28 Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (25.251-b08 mixed mode): "RMI TCP Accept-0" #14 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d80b6000 nid=0x5803 runnable [0x00007000059d8000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAccept(Native Method) at java.net.AbstractPlainSocketImpl.accept(AbstractPlainSocketImpl.java:409) at java.net.ServerSocket.implAccept(ServerSocket.java:545) at java.net.ServerSocket.accept(ServerSocket.java:513) at sun.management.jmxremote.LocalRMIServerSocketFactory$1.accept(LocalRMIServerSocketFactory.java:52) at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop.executeAcceptLoop(TCPTransport.java:405) at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$AcceptLoop.run(TCPTransport.java:377) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Attach Listener" #12 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db03d800 nid=0x3617 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Thread-1" #11 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db04e800 nid=0xa603 waiting for monitor entry [0x00007000057d2000] java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.transfer(BankTransferDemo.java:8) - waiting to lock <0x000000076ab76ef0> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) - locked <0x000000076ab76f10> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.lambda$1(BankTransferDemo.java:38) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo$$Lambda$2/1044036744.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Thread-0" #10 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d896e000 nid=0xa703 waiting for monitor entry [0x00007000056cf000] java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.transfer(BankTransferDemo.java:8) - waiting to lock <0x000000076ab76f10> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) - locked <0x000000076ab76ef0> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.lambda$0(BankTransferDemo.java:32) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo$$Lambda$1/135721597.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Service Thread" #9 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1de809000 nid=0x5503 runnable [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "C1 CompilerThread3" #8 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1df80a800 nid=0x3b03 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "C2 CompilerThread2" #7 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1df80a000 nid=0x3a03 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "C2 CompilerThread1" #6 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1df809000 nid=0x3e03 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "C2 CompilerThread0" #5 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1df008800 nid=0x3803 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Signal Dispatcher" #4 daemon prio=9 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1de808800 nid=0x4103 runnable [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Finalizer" #3 daemon prio=8 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d8810800 nid=0x3203 in Object.wait() [0x0000700004db1000] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on <0x000000076ab08ee0> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:144) - locked <0x000000076ab08ee0> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:165) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:216) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Reference Handler" #2 daemon prio=10 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d900b000 nid=0x3103 in Object.wait() [0x0000700004cae000] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on <0x000000076ab06c00> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:502) at java.lang.ref.Reference.tryHandlePending(Reference.java:191) - locked <0x000000076ab06c00> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:153) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "main" #1 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db809000 nid=0x1003 in Object.wait() [0x000070000408a000] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on <0x000000076ab770c0> (a java.lang.Thread) at java.lang.Thread.join(Thread.java:1252) - locked <0x000000076ab770c0> (a java.lang.Thread) at java.lang.Thread.join(Thread.java:1326) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.main(BankTransferDemo.java:45) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "VM Thread" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db821000 nid=0x4c03 runnable "GC task thread#0 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db809800 nid=0x1f07 runnable "GC task thread#1 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d8008800 nid=0x1b03 runnable "GC task thread#2 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db009000 nid=0x1d03 runnable "GC task thread#3 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db009800 nid=0x2a03 runnable "GC task thread#4 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db00a000 nid=0x2c03 runnable "GC task thread#5 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db00a800 nid=0x2d03 runnable "GC task thread#6 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db80a000 nid=0x5203 runnable "GC task thread#7 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db00b800 nid=0x5003 runnable "GC task thread#8 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1db00c000 nid=0x4f03 runnable "GC task thread#9 (ParallelGC)" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d900a800 nid=0x4d03 runnable "VM Periodic Task Thread" os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d8028800 nid=0xa803 waiting on condition JNI global references: 333 Found one Java-level deadlock: ============================= "Thread-1": waiting to lock monitor 0x00007fb1db8270a8 (object 0x000000076ab76ef0, a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount), which is held by "Thread-0" "Thread-0": waiting to lock monitor 0x00007fb1db827158 (object 0x000000076ab76f10, a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount), which is held by "Thread-1" Java stack information for the threads listed above: =================================================== "Thread-1": at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.transfer(BankTransferDemo.java:8) - waiting to lock <0x000000076ab76ef0> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) - locked <0x000000076ab76f10> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.lambda$1(BankTransferDemo.java:38) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo$$Lambda$2/1044036744.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) "Thread-0": at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.transfer(BankTransferDemo.java:8) - waiting to lock <0x000000076ab76f10> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) - locked <0x000000076ab76ef0> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.lambda$0(BankTransferDemo.java:32) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo$$Lambda$1/135721597.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) Found 1 deadlock.
咱們從中能夠看到線程的狀態有RUNNABLE,WAITING,BLOCKED,例如:
"Thread-0" #10 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007fb1d896e000 nid=0xa703 waiting for monitor entry [0x00007000056cf000] java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.transfer(BankTransferDemo.java:8) - waiting to lock <0x000000076ab76f10> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) - locked <0x000000076ab76ef0> (a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo.lambda$0(BankTransferDemo.java:32) at com.concurrency.demo.BankTransferDemo$$Lambda$1/135721597.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None
下面是死鎖的相關信息:
Found one Java-level deadlock: ============================= "Thread-1": waiting to lock monitor 0x00007fb1db8270a8 (object 0x000000076ab76ef0, a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount), which is held by "Thread-0" "Thread-0": waiting to lock monitor 0x00007fb1db827158 (object 0x000000076ab76f10, a com.concurrency.demo.BankAccount), which is held by "Thread-1"
從上面的描述中,咱們能夠清楚的看到2個線程在互相等待對方持有的鎖對象。
jstack是一個很是實用的工具,我會在後面找機會詳細的說明如何使用它和其餘相關工具。