mac os 觸摸屏_爲什麼沒有出現觸摸屏Mac

mac os 觸摸屏

Apple will make it easier to developers to port iPhone and iPad apps to the Mac, but that doesn’t mean a touchscreen Mac is coming out.

蘋果將​​使開發人員更容易將iPhone和iPad應用程序移植到Mac，但這並不意味着觸摸屏Mac將面世。

Craig Federighi, talking to Wired, said he’s 「not into touchscreens」 on PCs, and then went on:

Craig Federighi在與Wired交談時說，他「沒有進入PC上的觸摸屏」，然後繼續：

We really feel that the ergonomics of using a Mac are that your hands are rested on a surface, and that lifting your arm up to poke a screen is a pretty fatiguing thing to do. I don’t think we’ve looked at any of the other guys to date and said, how fast can we get there?

我們確實感到，使用Mac的人體工程學原理是將您的手放在表面上，擡起手臂戳屏幕是一件很令人疲勞的事情。 我認爲迄今爲止我們還沒有看過其他任何人，並且說，我們能快到那裏嗎？

This makes sense to me. I’ve tried several Windows computers that featured a touchscreen, and I’ll admit that it was occasionally nice to have—especially while scrolling. But there were also small annoyances. Most UI elements are too small to accurately touch while in desktop mode, and switching to tablet mode is never quite as fluid as it should be. And even the need for two separate 「modes」 is pretty confusing.

這對我來說很有意義。 我已經嘗試了幾臺帶有觸摸屏的Windows計算機，但我承認它偶爾會很不錯，尤其是在滾動時。 但是也有一些小煩惱。 大多數UI元素都太小，無法在桌面模式下準確觸摸，並且切換到平板電腦模式從來沒有像應該那樣流暢。 甚至需要兩個單獨的「模式」也很令人困惑。

It’s a compromise. A compromise that adds some cool features, sure, but one that drains the battery, makes the screen thicker, and leaves the user experience kid of messy. In other words, exactly the kind of compromise Apple doesn’t like to make.

這是一個妥協。 當然，一種折衷方案增加了一些很酷的功能，但是卻消耗了電池，使屏幕變厚並給用戶帶來麻煩。 換句話說，正是蘋果公司不願做出的妥協。

Apple could change course on this—it wouldn’t be the first time they said something isn’t happening multiple times only for it to happen. But I don’t think we’ll see a touchscreen Mac anytime soon (unless you count the Touch Bar, which you really shouldn’t.)

蘋果公司可以改變這條道路，這不是他們第一次說沒有發生多次只是爲了實現某件事。 但我認爲我們不會很快看到觸摸屏Mac(除非您算上Touch Bar，否則您真的不應該這樣)。

翻譯自: https://www.howtogeek.com/fyi/why-a-touchscreen-mac-isnt-happening/

mac os 觸摸屏