Jetpack 是一套庫、工具和指南,可幫助開發者更輕鬆地編寫優質應用。這些組件可幫助您遵循最佳作法、讓您擺脫編寫樣板代碼的工做並簡化複雜任務,以便您將精力集中放在所需的代碼上。java
Jetpack 包含與平臺 API 解除捆綁的 androidx.* (android.*)軟件包庫。這意味着,它能夠提供向後兼容性,且比 Android 平臺的更新頻率更高,以此確保您始終能夠獲取最新且最好的 Jetpack 組件版本。 官方網址介紹:Android jetpack介紹android
Android Jetpack組件的優點:web
1.管理應用程序(Activity、Fragment)的生命週期(如後臺任務、導航和生命週期管理) 2.構建可觀察的數據對象,以便在基礎數據庫更改時通知視圖(View) 3.存儲在應用程序輪換中未銷燬的UI相關數據,在界面重建後恢復數據 4.輕鬆的實現SQLite數據庫 5.系統自動調度後臺任務的執行,優化使用性能算法
Lifecycles是一個持有組件生命週期狀態(Activity、Fragment)信息的類,用來解決生命週期管理問題的組件。經過監聽生命週期的方式(Handling Lifecycles with Lifecycle-Aware Components),並容許其餘對象觀察此狀態。生命週期使用兩個主要枚舉來跟蹤其關聯組件的生命週期狀態:數據庫
1.Event:從框架和Lifecycle類派發的生命週期事件。 這些事件映射到活動和片斷中的回調事件。 2.State:由Lifecycle對象跟蹤的組件的當前狀態。 Event和State的對應關係以下圖:Android Developer官網關於State 的轉化圖 安全
def lifecycle_version = "2.0.0"
// alternatively - Lifecycles only (no ViewModel or LiveData). Some UI
// AndroidX libraries use this lightweight import for Lifecycle
implementation "androidx.lifecycle:lifecycle-runtime:$lifecycle_version"
// For Kotlin use kapt instead of annotationProcessor
annotationProcessor "androidx.lifecycle:lifecycle-compiler:$lifecycle_version"
// alternately - if using Java8, use the following instead of lifecycle-compiler
implementation "androidx.lifecycle:lifecycle-common-java8:$lifecycle_version"
複製代碼
1.建立MyCustomLifecycles 繼承 LifecycleObserver 2.使用註解在每一個方法上標記相應的生命週期bash
注意定義的方法裏面的參數,Lifecycles對於參數是有要求的。具體緣由分析源碼的時候會具體分析(參考3.2.2) 1.若是參數個數大於0。第一個參數必須是LifecycleOwner或者是LifecycleOwner的超類 2.參數個數不大於1時,第一個參數同1第,二個參數必須是Lifecycle.Event或者是Lifecycle.Event的超類,並且註解的Event必須是Lifecycle.Event.ON_ANY 3.參數個數最大是2。不然會出現非法狀態異常session
class MyCustomLifecycles() : LifecycleObserver{
@OnLifecycleEvent(Lifecycle.Event.ON_ANY)
fun onCreate(lifecycleOwner: LifecycleOwner,event :Lifecycle.Event = Lifecycle.Event.ON_ANY ){
}
@OnLifecycleEvent(Lifecycle.Event.ON_RESUME)
fun onResume(){
}
@OnLifecycleEvent(Lifecycle.Event.ON_DESTROY)
fun onDestroy(){
}
}
interface MyCallback{
fun test()
}
複製代碼
若是是支持Java8的話,而且gradle引用了** implementation "androidx.lifecycle:lifecycle-common-java8:$lifecycle_version"` **也能夠這麼聲明數據結構
class MyCustomj8Lifecycles : DefaultLifecycleObserver{
override fun onCreate(owner: LifecycleOwner) {
super.onCreate(owner)
}
override fun onResume(owner: LifecycleOwner) {
super.onResume(owner)
}
}
/**
**已經棄用了
**/
public class MyGenericLifecycles : GenericLifeCycleObserver {
}
複製代碼
class DataBindingActivity : AppCompatActivity(),LifecycleOwner{
}
複製代碼
在v4包中SupportActivity已經實現了LifecycleOwner。注意是v4包下,不是androidX下面的。代碼以下app
public class SupportActivity extends Activity implements LifecycleOwner, Component {
private SimpleArrayMap<Class<? extends SupportActivity.ExtraData>, SupportActivity.ExtraData> mExtraDataMap = new SimpleArrayMap();
private LifecycleRegistry mLifecycleRegistry = new LifecycleRegistry(this);
public SupportActivity() {
}
}
複製代碼
因此若是你的Activity已經繼承SupportActivity,由於在v4包中SupportActivity已經實現了LifecycleOwner。能夠省略以下代碼
private lateinit var lifeCycleRegistry: LifecycleRegistry
private lateinit var myCustomLifecycles: MyCustomLifecycles
override fun getLifecycle(): Lifecycle {
return lifeCycleRegistry
}
複製代碼
在addObserver方法中會涉及到自定義Observer的解析。
myCustomLifecycles = MyCustomLifecycles()
lifecycle.addObserver(myCustomLifecycles)
複製代碼
注意點:若是你的Activity繼承的是v4包下的AppCompatActivity能夠忽略該步驟,observer依舊能夠相應Observer的Event註解的方法。可是若是是androidx.appcompat.app.AppCompatActivity,必須在Activity的生命週期中使用markState方法,不然註解的方法沒法獲得執行。不能夠忽略該步驟,具體緣由後面會分析。
lifeCycleRegistry.markState(Lifecycle.State.CREATED)
lifeCycleRegistry.markState(Lifecycle.State.RESUMED)
複製代碼
完整類代碼以下:
class DataBindingActivity : AppCompatActivity(),LifecycleOwner{
private lateinit var lifeCycleRegistry: LifecycleRegistry
private lateinit var myCustomLifecycles: MyCustomLifecycles
override fun getLifecycle(): Lifecycle {
return lifeCycleRegistry
}
override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
lifeCycleRegistry = LifecycleRegistry(this)
myCustomLifecycles = MyCustomLifecycles()
lifecycle.addObserver(myCustomLifecycles)
lifeCycleRegistry.markState(Lifecycle.State.CREATED)
}
override fun onResume() {
lifeCycleRegistry.markState(Lifecycle.State.RESUMED)
super.onResume()
}
}
複製代碼
咱們都知道Lifecycles是感應Activity的生命週期的,那麼在使用Lifecycles時主要有一下幾個疑問: 1.在Activity的生命週期發生變化的時候,LifecycleObserver聲明的註解方法是怎麼被觸發的。 2.觸發註解方法之後,註解的方法怎麼被執行的。 下面就帶着這幾個疑問分析一下源碼
在分析源代碼以前,先了解一下SafeIterableMap類(非線程安全),由於在類LifecycleRegistry中會用到FastSafeIterableMap<LifecycleObserver, ObserverWithState>,而FastSafeIterableMap的父類就是SafeIterableMap。SafeIterableMap類實際是個雙向鏈表,支持鍵值對存儲,而且可以能在遍歷中刪除元素(interface SupportRemove<K, V> { void supportRemove(@NonNull Entry<K, V> entry); }
)。適用於數據量存儲不大的場景。 具備以下優勢: 1.SafeIterableMap 的插入操做是時間複雜度O(1)直接經過指針的移動插入數據,並且不須要執行hash算法,效率高。 2.遍歷的過程當中刪除元素而不觸發ConcurrentModifiedException。 3.使用雙向鏈表來存儲會比 HashMap (java 8 紅黑樹)節省內存空間。
protected Entry<K, V> get(K k) {
Entry<K, V> currentNode = mStart;
while (currentNode != null) {
if (currentNode.mKey.equals(k)) {
break;
}
currentNode = currentNode.mNext;
}
return currentNode;
}
複製代碼
protected Entry<K, V> put(@NonNull K key, @NonNull V v) {
Entry<K, V> newEntry = new Entry<>(key, v);
mSize++;
if (mEnd == null) {
mStart = newEntry;
mEnd = mStart;
return newEntry;
}
mEnd.mNext = newEntry;
newEntry.mPrevious = mEnd;
mEnd = newEntry;
return newEntry;
}
複製代碼
public V putIfAbsent(@NonNull K key, @NonNull V v) {
Entry<K, V> entry = get(key);
if (entry != null) {
return entry.mValue;
}
put(key, v);
return null;
}
複製代碼
public V remove(@NonNull K key) {
Entry<K, V> toRemove = get(key);
if (toRemove == null) {
return null;
}
mSize--;
if (!mIterators.isEmpty()) {
for (SupportRemove<K, V> iter : mIterators.keySet()) {
iter.supportRemove(toRemove);
}
}
if (toRemove.mPrevious != null) {
toRemove.mPrevious.mNext = toRemove.mNext;
} else {
mStart = toRemove.mNext;
}
if (toRemove.mNext != null) {
toRemove.mNext.mPrevious = toRemove.mPrevious;
} else {
mEnd = toRemove.mPrevious;
}
toRemove.mNext = null;
toRemove.mPrevious = null;
return toRemove.mValue;
}
複製代碼
private WeakHashMap<SupportRemove<K, V>, Boolean> mIterators = new WeakHashMap<>();
public Iterator<Map.Entry<K, V>> iterator() {
ListIterator<K, V> iterator = new AscendingIterator<>(mStart, mEnd);
mIterators.put(iterator, false);
return iterator;
}
public Iterator<Map.Entry<K, V>> descendingIterator() {
DescendingIterator<K, V> iterator = new DescendingIterator<>(mEnd, mStart);
mIterators.put(iterator, false);
return iterator;
}
public IteratorWithAdditions iteratorWithAdditions() {
IteratorWithAdditions iterator = new IteratorWithAdditions();
mIterators.put(iterator, false);
return iterator;
}
複製代碼
SupportRemove接口有兩個實現類,每當刪除元素,並且mIterators不是空時,會調用這個方法對entry進行刪除。SupportRemove經過調整尾指針和下一個元素的指針,達到安全遍歷的效果。
IteratorWithAdditions
private class IteratorWithAdditions implements Iterator<Map.Entry<K, V>>, SupportRemove<K, V> {
@Override
public void supportRemove(@NonNull Entry<K, V> entry) {
}
}
複製代碼
ListIterator有兩個子類
private abstract static class ListIterator<K, V> implements Iterator<Map.Entry<K, V>>,
SupportRemove<K, V> {
@Override
public void supportRemove(@NonNull Entry<K, V> entry) {
}
}
private static class AscendingIterator<K, V> extends ListIterator<K, V> {
}
private static class DescendingIterator<K, V> extends ListIterator<K, V> {
}
複製代碼
以網上比較全的一張圖來講明,其中設計到的主要類的類關係圖。 Lifecycle組件成員Lifecycle被定義成了抽象類,LifecycleOwner、LifecycleObserver被定義成了接口。 組件(Activity、Fragment)實現了LifecycleOwner接口,該只有一個返回Lifecycle對象的方法getLifecyle(): LifecycleRegistry。 Lifecycle的內部類State標明狀態、Event表示事件 ObserverWithState的成員變量GenericLifecycleObserver繼承自LifecycleObserver Fragment中getLifecycle()方法返回的是繼承了抽象類Lifecycle的LifecycleRegistry。
public LifecycleRegistry(@NonNull LifecycleOwner provider) {
mLifecycleOwner = new WeakReference<>(provider);
mState = INITIALIZED;
}
複製代碼
public void addObserver(@NonNull LifecycleObserver observer) {
State initialState = mState == DESTROYED ? DESTROYED : INITIALIZED;
ObserverWithState statefulObserver = new ObserverWithState(observer, initialState);
ObserverWithState previous = mObserverMap.putIfAbsent(observer, statefulObserver);
...........
}
複製代碼
static class ObserverWithState {
State mState;
GenericLifecycleObserver mLifecycleObserver;
ObserverWithState(LifecycleObserver observer, State initialState) {
mLifecycleObserver = Lifecycling.getCallback(observer);
mState = initialState;
}
void dispatchEvent(LifecycleOwner owner, Event event) {
State newState = getStateAfter(event);
mState = min(mState, newState);
mLifecycleObserver.onStateChanged(owner, event);
mState = newState;
}
}
複製代碼
@NonNull
static GenericLifecycleObserver getCallback(Object object) {
if (object instanceof FullLifecycleObserver) {
return new FullLifecycleObserverAdapter((FullLifecycleObserver) object);
}
if (object instanceof GenericLifecycleObserver) {
return (GenericLifecycleObserver) object;
}
final Class<?> klass = object.getClass();
int type = getObserverConstructorType(klass);
if (type == GENERATED_CALLBACK) {
List<Constructor<? extends GeneratedAdapter>> constructors =
sClassToAdapters.get(klass);
if (constructors.size() == 1) {
GeneratedAdapter generatedAdapter = createGeneratedAdapter(
constructors.get(0), object);
return new SingleGeneratedAdapterObserver(generatedAdapter);
}
GeneratedAdapter[] adapters = new GeneratedAdapter[constructors.size()];
for (int i = 0; i < constructors.size(); i++) {
adapters[i] = createGeneratedAdapter(constructors.get(i), object);
}
return new CompositeGeneratedAdaptersObserver(adapters);
}
return new ReflectiveGenericLifecycleObserver(object);
}
複製代碼
在getCallback根據咱們在傳入類不一樣構建不一樣的GenericLifecycleObserver子類,經過上下文知道,咱們傳入的是LifecycleObserver的子類,因此下面兩個條件都不成立。
if (object instanceof FullLifecycleObserver) {
return new FullLifecycleObserverAdapter((FullLifecycleObserver) object);
}
if (object instanceof GenericLifecycleObserver) {
return (GenericLifecycleObserver) object;
}
複製代碼
s在getObserverConstructorType方法中會繼續調用resolveObserverCallbackType方法,下面咱們來分析該方法。 (1)代碼塊1:主要是看有沒有生成XXX_LifecycleAdapter的類,XXX表示自定義的Observer類。在2.0.0的版本是沒有的。多是爲了兼容老代碼 (2)代碼塊2:是否有OnLifecycleEvent註解的方法。顯然咱們是經過註解的方式實現的。
private static int resolveObserverCallbackType(Class<?> klass) {
// anonymous class bug:35073837
//確定不爲null
if (klass.getCanonicalName() == null) {
return REFLECTIVE_CALLBACK;
}
//代碼塊1
Constructor<? extends GeneratedAdapter> constructor = generatedConstructor(klass);
if (constructor != null) {
sClassToAdapters.put(klass, Collections
.<Constructor<? extends GeneratedAdapter>>singletonList(constructor));
return GENERATED_CALLBACK;
}
//代碼塊2
boolean hasLifecycleMethods = ClassesInfoCache.sInstance.hasLifecycleMethods(klass);
if (hasLifecycleMethods) {
return REFLECTIVE_CALLBACK;
}
Class<?> superclass = klass.getSuperclass();
List<Constructor<? extends GeneratedAdapter>> adapterConstructors = null;
if (isLifecycleParent(superclass)) {
if (getObserverConstructorType(superclass) == REFLECTIVE_CALLBACK) {
return REFLECTIVE_CALLBACK;
}
adapterConstructors = new ArrayList<>(sClassToAdapters.get(superclass));
}
for (Class<?> intrface : klass.getInterfaces()) {
if (!isLifecycleParent(intrface)) {
continue;
}
if (getObserverConstructorType(intrface) == REFLECTIVE_CALLBACK) {
return REFLECTIVE_CALLBACK;
}
if (adapterConstructors == null) {
adapterConstructors = new ArrayList<>();
}
adapterConstructors.addAll(sClassToAdapters.get(intrface));
}
if (adapterConstructors != null) {
sClassToAdapters.put(klass, adapterConstructors);
return GENERATED_CALLBACK;
}
return REFLECTIVE_CALLBACK;
}
複製代碼
class ReflectiveGenericLifecycleObserver implements GenericLifecycleObserver {
private final Object mWrapped;
private final CallbackInfo mInfo;
ReflectiveGenericLifecycleObserver(Object wrapped) {
mWrapped = wrapped;
mInfo = ClassesInfoCache.sInstance.getInfo(mWrapped.getClass());
}
@Override
public void onStateChanged(LifecycleOwner source, Event event) {
mInfo.invokeCallbacks(source, event, mWrapped);
}
}
複製代碼
MethodReference(int callType, Method method) {
mCallType = callType;
mMethod = method;
mMethod.setAccessible(true);
}
複製代碼
CallbackInfo裏面主要是兩個HashMap。 mEventToHandlers以Event做爲KeyList做爲value。這樣存儲的好處是,根據Event事件,能夠快速的找到對應的全部註解方法。 mHandlerToEvent以MethodReference,Event鍵值對的形式存儲,意識是某個註解方法對應的Event事件。
final Map<Lifecycle.Event, List<MethodReference>> mEventToHandlers;
final Map<MethodReference, Lifecycle.Event> mHandlerToEvent;
複製代碼
private CallbackInfo createInfo(Class klass, @Nullable Method[] declaredMethods) {
Class superclass = klass.getSuperclass();
Map<MethodReference, Lifecycle.Event> handlerToEvent = new HashMap<>();
if (superclass != null) {
CallbackInfo superInfo = getInfo(superclass);
if (superInfo != null) {
handlerToEvent.putAll(superInfo.mHandlerToEvent);
}
}
Class[] interfaces = klass.getInterfaces();
for (Class intrfc : interfaces) {
for (Map.Entry<MethodReference, Lifecycle.Event> entry : getInfo(
intrfc).mHandlerToEvent.entrySet()) {
verifyAndPutHandler(handlerToEvent, entry.getKey(), entry.getValue(), klass);
}
}
Method[] methods = declaredMethods != null ? declaredMethods : getDeclaredMethods(klass);
boolean hasLifecycleMethods = false;
for (Method method : methods) {
OnLifecycleEvent annotation = method.getAnnotation(OnLifecycleEvent.class);
if (annotation == null) {
continue;
}
hasLifecycleMethods = true;
Class<?>[] params = method.getParameterTypes();
int callType = CALL_TYPE_NO_ARG;
if (params.length > 0) {
callType = CALL_TYPE_PROVIDER;
//1.若是參數個數大於0。第一個參數必須是LifecycleOwner或者是LifecycleOwner的超類
if (!params[0].isAssignableFrom(LifecycleOwner.class)) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"invalid parameter type. Must be one and instanceof LifecycleOwner");
}
}
Lifecycle.Event event = annotation.value();
if (params.length > 1) {
callType = CALL_TYPE_PROVIDER_WITH_EVENT;
// 2.參數個數不大於1時,第一個參數同1第,二個參數必須是Lifecycle.Event或者是Lifecycle.Event的超類,並且註解
//Event必須是Lifecycle.Event.ON_ANY
if (!params[1].isAssignableFrom(Lifecycle.Event.class)) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"invalid parameter type. second arg must be an event");
}
if (event != Lifecycle.Event.ON_ANY) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"Second arg is supported only for ON_ANY value");
}
}
//3.參數個數最大是2。不然會出現非法狀態異常
if (params.length > 2) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("cannot have more than 2 params");
}
MethodReference methodReference = new MethodReference(callType, method);
verifyAndPutHandler(handlerToEvent, methodReference, event, klass);
}
CallbackInfo info = new CallbackInfo(handlerToEvent);
mCallbackMap.put(klass, info);
mHasLifecycleMethods.put(klass, hasLifecycleMethods);
return info;
}
複製代碼
在上面咱們分析了自定義的Observer是如何被解析的,那麼解析出來的方法method是在哪裏觸發執行的呢。下面咱們開始分析。首先說明,若是你繼承的類要是v4包中AppCompatActivity,由於在androidx中的繼承關係和v4包是有區別的。在androidx下AppCompatActivity超類沒有SupportActivity。 注意是v4包下,不是androidX下面的。
@RestrictTo(LIBRARY_GROUP)
public class SupportActivity extends Activity implements LifecycleOwner {
private LifecycleRegistry mLifecycleRegistry = new LifecycleRegistry(this);
@Override
public Lifecycle getLifecycle() {
return mLifecycleRegistry;
}
protected void onCreate(@Nullable Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
ReportFragment.injectIfNeededIn(this);
}
}
複製代碼
public class ReportFragment extends Fragment {
private static final String REPORT_FRAGMENT_TAG = "android.arch.lifecycle"
+ ".LifecycleDispatcher.report_fragment_tag";
public static void injectIfNeededIn(Activity activity) { //初始化Fragment
android.app.FragmentManager manager = activity.getFragmentManager();
if (manager.findFragmentByTag(REPORT_FRAGMENT_TAG) == null) {
manager.beginTransaction().add(new ReportFragment(), REPORT_FRAGMENT_TAG).commit();
manager.executePendingTransactions();
}
}
@Override
public void onActivityCreated(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onActivityCreated(savedInstanceState);
dispatchCreate(mProcessListener);
dispatch(Lifecycle.Event.ON_CREATE);
}
@Override
public void onStart() {
super.onStart();
dispatchStart(mProcessListener);
dispatch(Lifecycle.Event.ON_START);
}
@Override
public void onResume() {
super.onResume();
dispatchResume(mProcessListener);
dispatch(Lifecycle.Event.ON_RESUME);
}
@Override
public void onPause() {
super.onPause();
dispatch(Lifecycle.Event.ON_PAUSE);
}
@Override
public void onStop() {
super.onStop();
dispatch(Lifecycle.Event.ON_STOP);
}
@Override
public void onDestroy() {
super.onDestroy();
dispatch(Lifecycle.Event.ON_DESTROY);
mProcessListener = null;
}
private void dispatch(Lifecycle.Event event) {
Activity activity = getActivity();
if (activity instanceof LifecycleRegistryOwner) {
((LifecycleRegistryOwner) activity).getLifecycle().handleLifecycleEvent(event);
return;
}
if (activity instanceof LifecycleOwner) {
Lifecycle lifecycle = ((LifecycleOwner) activity).getLifecycle();
if (lifecycle instanceof LifecycleRegistry) {
((LifecycleRegistry) lifecycle).handleLifecycleEvent(event);
}
}
}
}
複製代碼
public void handleLifecycleEvent(@NonNull Lifecycle.Event event) {
State next = getStateAfter(event);
moveToState(next);
}
複製代碼
static State getStateAfter(Event event) {
switch (event) {
case ON_CREATE:
case ON_STOP:
return CREATED;
case ON_START:
case ON_PAUSE:
return STARTED;
case ON_RESUME:
return RESUMED;
case ON_DESTROY:
return DESTROYED;
case ON_ANY:
break;
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Unexpected event value " + event);
}
private void moveToState(State next) {
if (mState == next) {
return;
}
mState = next;
//代碼1
if (mHandlingEvent || mAddingObserverCounter != 0) {
mNewEventOccurred = true;
// we will figure out what to do on upper level.
return;
}
mHandlingEvent = true;
sync();
mHandlingEvent = false;
}
複製代碼
對於代碼1處的解釋: 當正在sync中處理改變狀態時 mHandlingEvent = true;當咱們調用addObserver時 mAddingObserverCounter != 0以上這兩種狀態都是正在執行任務的狀態,因此此時直接return 在getStateAfter中首先根據執行的Lifecycle.Event,判斷執行事件後下一個到達的狀態,而後使用moveToState()中的sync()修改活動的生命週期: 4. sync() 顧名思義是用來同步事件的。 (1)判斷是否有LifecycleOwner對象,LifecycleOwner是在構造方法經過若引用初始化的。判斷當前時候有其餘的sync操做 2 )咱們知道Lifecycle.Event和Lifecycle.State的聲明順序是和活動 的聲明週期執行順序一致的,因此對Lifecycle.State的先後順序的比較也就反應了聲明週期狀態的變換,比較下一個狀態和以前狀態集合裏面的狀態大小,mObserverMap.eldest()獲取的是雙向鏈表裏面的第一個數據,mObserverMap.newest()獲取的是尾部數據,這樣的數據結構好處就凸顯出來了,能夠直接獲取頭部和尾部指針。好比活動此時的生命週期爲CREATED(此時mObserverMap中保存的狀態爲CREATED),而下一個變換的狀態爲Started(此時的mState爲Started),從聲明週期中能夠知道此時執行的時onStart(),對應的LIfecycle.Event爲onStart。
private void sync() {
LifecycleOwner lifecycleOwner = mLifecycleOwner.get();
if (lifecycleOwner == null) {
Log.w(LOG_TAG, "LifecycleOwner is garbage collected, you shouldn't try dispatch "
+ "new events from it.");
return;
}
while (!isSynced()) {
mNewEventOccurred = false;
// no need to check eldest for nullability, because isSynced does it for us.
if (mState.compareTo(mObserverMap.eldest().getValue().mState) < 0) {
backwardPass(lifecycleOwner);
}
Entry<LifecycleObserver, ObserverWithState> newest = mObserverMap.newest();
if (!mNewEventOccurred && newest != null
&& mState.compareTo(newest.getValue().mState) > 0) {
forwardPass(lifecycleOwner);
}
}
mNewEventOccurred = false;
}
複製代碼
while循環是由於有多個Observer的存在。在forwardPass()方法中會將ObserverWithState中保存的狀態與mState比較,若是小於目標State。而後調用upEvent()根據保存的狀態找出要執行的Event,並調用Observer的dispatEvent()方法發送事件。
private void forwardPass(LifecycleOwner lifecycleOwner) {
Iterator<Entry<LifecycleObserver, ObserverWithState>> ascendingIterator =
mObserverMap.iteratorWithAdditions();
while (ascendingIterator.hasNext() && !mNewEventOccurred) {
Entry<LifecycleObserver, ObserverWithState> entry = ascendingIterator.next();
ObserverWithState observer = entry.getValue();
while ((observer.mState.compareTo(mState) < 0 && !mNewEventOccurred
&& mObserverMap.contains(entry.getKey()))) {
pushParentState(observer.mState);
observer.dispatchEvent(lifecycleOwner, upEvent(observer.mState));
popParentState();
}
}
}
複製代碼
private static Event upEvent(State state) {
switch (state) {
case INITIALIZED:
case DESTROYED:
return ON_CREATE;
case CREATED:
return ON_START;
case STARTED:
return ON_RESUME;
case RESUMED:
throw new IllegalArgumentException();
}
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Unexpected state value " + state);
}
複製代碼
static class ObserverWithState {
State mState;
GenericLifecycleObserver mLifecycleObserver;
ObserverWithState(LifecycleObserver observer, State initialState) {
mLifecycleObserver = Lifecycling.getCallback(observer);
mState = initialState;
}
void dispatchEvent(LifecycleOwner owner, Event event) {
State newState = getStateAfter(event);
mState = min(mState, newState);
mLifecycleObserver.onStateChanged(owner, event);
mState = newState;
}
}
複製代碼
void invokeCallbacks(LifecycleOwner source, Lifecycle.Event event, Object target) {
invokeMethodsForEvent(mEventToHandlers.get(event), source, event, target);
invokeMethodsForEvent(mEventToHandlers.get(Lifecycle.Event.ON_ANY), source, event,
target);
}
private static void invokeMethodsForEvent(List<MethodReference> handlers,
LifecycleOwner source, Lifecycle.Event event, Object mWrapped) {
if (handlers != null) {
for (int i = handlers.size() - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
handlers.get(i).invokeCallback(source, event, mWrapped);
}
void invokeCallback(LifecycleOwner source, Lifecycle.Event event, Object target) {
//noinspection TryWithIdenticalCatches
try {
switch (mCallType) {
case CALL_TYPE_NO_ARG:
mMethod.invoke(target);
break;
case CALL_TYPE_PROVIDER:
mMethod.invoke(target, source);
break;
case CALL_TYPE_PROVIDER_WITH_EVENT:
mMethod.invoke(target, source, event);
break;
}
} catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
throw new RuntimeException("Failed to call observer method", e.getCause());
} catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
複製代碼
@Override
public void removeObserver(@NonNull LifecycleObserver observer) {
// we consciously decided not to send destruction events here in opposition to addObserver.
// Our reasons for that:
// 1. These events haven't yet happened at all. In contrast to events in addObservers, that // actually occurred but earlier. // 2. There are cases when removeObserver happens as a consequence of some kind of fatal // event. If removeObserver method sends destruction events, then a clean up routine becomes // more cumbersome. More specific example of that is: your LifecycleObserver listens for // a web connection, in the usual routine in OnStop method you report to a server that a // session has just ended and you close the connection. Now let's assume now that you
// lost an internet and as a result you removed this observer. If you get destruction
// events in removeObserver, you should have a special case in your onStop method that
// checks if your web connection died and you shouldn't try to report anything to a server. mObserverMap.remove(observer); } 複製代碼