複製文件的大小爲2.5G,對比一下使用FileOutputStream和BufferedOutputStream的效率windows
我理解,使用文件流對文件進行讀寫和複製,和在windows上使用鼠標點擊文件複製本質上應該是同樣的code
使用正常的FileOutputStream複製文件:ip
private static void transfer() { long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis(); File file = new File("d:\\CPMS.zip"); FileInputStream fis = null; FileOutputStream fos = null; try { fis = new FileInputStream(file); fos = new FileOutputStream(new File("D:\\downloads\\" + file.getName())); int length = 0; byte[] b = new byte[1024]; while ((length = fis.read(b)) != -1) { fos.write(b, 0, length); } } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } finally { if (fis != null) { try { fis.close(); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } if (fos != null) { try { fos.close(); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } long t2 = System.currentTimeMillis(); System.out.println("複製文件用時:" + (t2 - t1) + " ms"); }
控制檯輸出get
複製文件用時:22115 ms
使用BufferedOutputStream複製文件:it
private static void copyFile() { long t1 = System.currentTimeMillis(); File file = new File("D:\\CPMS.zip"); FileInputStream fis = null; BufferedInputStream bis = null; BufferedOutputStream bos = null; FileOutputStream fos = null; try { fis = new FileInputStream(file); bis = new BufferedInputStream(fis); fos = new FileOutputStream(new File("D:\\downloads\\" + file.getName())); bos = new BufferedOutputStream(fos); int length = 0; byte[] b = new byte[1024]; while ((length = fis.read(b)) != -1) { bos.write(b, 0, length); } bos.flush(); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } finally { if (fis != null) { try { fis.close(); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } if (bis != null) { try { bis.close(); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } if (fos != null) { try { fos.close(); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } if (bos != null) { try { bos.close(); } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } long t2 = System.currentTimeMillis(); System.out.println("複製文件用時:" + (t2 - t1) + " ms"); }
控制檯輸出io
複製文件用時:11974 ms
看上去時間差異挺大的,因此建議仍是使用緩衝流來讀寫文件,提升效率效率