單例模式相信你們都知道,用過的人不在少數。以前寫過一篇博文《singleton模式四種線程安全的實現》(參見:http://blog.csdn.NET/u013256816/article/details/50427061),講訴了單例模式的四種寫法,並指出佔位符模式的寫法比較ok,詳見以下:java
package com.effective.singleton; public class Elvis { private static boolean flag = false; private Elvis(){ } private static class SingletonHolder{ private static final Elvis INSTANCE = new Elvis(); } public static Elvis getInstance() { return SingletonHolder.INSTANCE; } public void doSomethingElse() { } }
但這都是基於一個條件:確保不會經過反射機制調用私有的構造器。
這裏舉個例子,經過JAVA的反射機制來「攻擊」單例模式:安全
package com.effective.singleton; import java.lang.reflect.Constructor; import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; public class ElvisReflectAttack { public static void main(String[] args) throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException, IllegalArgumentException, InvocationTargetException, NoSuchMethodException, SecurityException { Class<?> classType = Elvis.class; Constructor<?> c = classType.getDeclaredConstructor(null); c.setAccessible(true); Elvis e1 = (Elvis)c.newInstance(); Elvis e2 = Elvis.getInstance(); System.out.println(e1==e2); } }
運行結果:false
能夠看到,經過反射獲取構造函數,而後調用setAccessible(true)就能夠調用私有的構造函數,全部e1和e2是兩個不一樣的對象。
若是要抵禦這種攻擊,能夠修改構造器,讓它在被要求建立第二個實例的時候拋出異常。
經修改後:函數
package com.effective.singleton; public class ElvisModified { private static boolean flag = false; private ElvisModified(){ synchronized(ElvisModified.class) { if(flag == false) { flag = !flag; } else { throw new RuntimeException("單例模式被侵犯!"); } } } private static class SingletonHolder{ private static final ElvisModified INSTANCE = new ElvisModified(); } public static ElvisModified getInstance() { return SingletonHolder.INSTANCE; } public void doSomethingElse() { } }
測試代碼:測試
package com.effective.singleton; import java.lang.reflect.Constructor; public class ElvisModifiedReflectAttack { public static void main(String[] args) { try { Class<ElvisModified> classType = ElvisModified.class; Constructor<ElvisModified> c = classType.getDeclaredConstructor(null); c.setAccessible(true); ElvisModified e1 = (ElvisModified)c.newInstance(); ElvisModified e2 = ElvisModified.getInstance(); System.out.println(e1==e2); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } }
運行結果:.net
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError at com.effective.singleton.ElvisModified.getInstance(ElvisModified.java:27) at com.effective.singleton.ElvisModifiedReflectAttack.main(ElvisModifiedReflectAttack.java:17) Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: 單例模式被侵犯! at com.effective.singleton.ElvisModified.<init>(ElvisModified.java:16) at com.effective.singleton.ElvisModified.<init>(ElvisModified.java:7) at com.effective.singleton.ElvisModified$SingletonHolder.<clinit>(ElvisModified.java:22) ... 2 more
能夠看到,成功的阻止了單例模式被破壞。
從JDK1.5開始,實現Singleton還有新的寫法,只需編寫一個包含單個元素的枚舉類型。推薦寫法:線程
package com.effective.singleton; public enum SingletonClass { INSTANCE; public void test() { System.out.println("The Test!"); } }
測試代碼:code
package com.effective; import java.lang.reflect.Constructor; import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; import com.effective.singleton.SingletonClass; public class TestMain { public static void main(String[] args) throws NoSuchMethodException, SecurityException, InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException, IllegalArgumentException, InvocationTargetException { Class<SingletonClass> classType = SingletonClass.class; Constructor<SingletonClass> c = (Constructor<SingletonClass>) classType.getDeclaredConstructor(); c.setAccessible(true); c.newInstance(); } }
運行結果:對象
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: com.effective.singleton.SingletonClass.<init>() at java.lang.Class.getConstructor0(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredConstructor(Unknown Source) at com.effective.TestMain.main(TestMain.java:22)
因而可知這種寫法也能夠防止單例模式被「攻擊」。
並且這種寫法也能夠防止序列化破壞單例模式,具體不在舉例了,有關序列化以及單例模式被序列化破壞能夠參考博文《JAVA序列化》(連接:http://blog.csdn.net/u013256816/article/details/50474678)。
單元素的枚舉類型已經成爲實現Singleton模式的最佳方法blog