同事無心間提出了這個問題,親自實踐了兩種方法。固然確定還會有更多更好的方法。若是你知道請麻煩留言告訴我。若是文中有不對的地方,也請告知,謝謝~java
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger; public class OrderedThread1 { static AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(0); public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException { Task task1 = new Task(count, 0); Task task2 = new Task(count, 1); Task task3 = new Task(count, 2); Thread thread1 = new Thread(task1); Thread thread2 = new Thread(task2); Thread thread3 = new Thread(task3); thread1.setDaemon(true); thread2.setDaemon(true); thread3.setDaemon(true); thread1.start(); thread2.start(); thread3.start(); Thread.sleep(1 * 1000); } } class Task implements Runnable { private AtomicInteger count; private int order; public Task(AtomicInteger count, int order) { this.count = count; this.order = order; } @Override public void run() { while (true) { if (count.get() % 3 == order) { System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " ===== "+ order); count.incrementAndGet(); } } } }
這種方法應該是比較常見的解決方案。利用原子遞增控制線程准入順序。安全
public class OrderedThread2 { static Holder holder = new Holder(); public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException { Task1 task1 = new Task1(holder, 0); Task1 task2 = new Task1(holder, 1); Task1 task3 = new Task1(holder, 2); Thread thread1 = new Thread(task1); Thread thread2 = new Thread(task2); Thread thread3 = new Thread(task3); thread1.setDaemon(true); thread2.setDaemon(true); thread3.setDaemon(true); thread1.start(); thread2.start(); thread3.start(); Thread.sleep(1 * 1000); } } class Task1 implements Runnable { Holder holder; int order; public Task1(Holder holder, int order) { this.holder = holder; this.order = order; } @Override public void run() { while (true) { if (holder.count % 3 == order) { System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + " ===== "+ order); holder.count ++; } } // int i = 0; // while(i ++ < 10000){ // holder.count ++; // } } } class Holder { volatile int count = 0; }
方法二使用了volatile關鍵字。讓每一個線程都能拿到最新的count的值,當其中一個線程執行++操做後,其餘兩個線程就會拿到最新的值,並檢查是否符合准入條件。併發
ps:volatile不是線程安全的。並且二者沒有任何關係。volatile變量不在用戶線程保存副本,所以對全部線程都能提供最新的值。但試想,若是多個線程同時併發更新這個變量,其結果也是顯而易見的,最後一次的更新會覆蓋前面全部更新,致使線程不安全。在方法二中,一次只有一個線程知足准入條件,所以不存在對變量的併發更新。volatile的值是最新的與線程安全徹底是不相干的,因此不要誤用volatile實現併發控制。ide