在spring的註解 @RequestMapping
之下能夠直接獲取 HttpServletRequest
來得到諸如request header等重要的請求信息:java
@Slf4j @RestController @RequestMapping("/test") public class TestController { private static final String HEADER = "app-version"; @RequestMapping(value = "/async", method = RequestMethod.GET) public void test(HttpServletRequest request) { request.getHeader(HEADER); } }
每每,這些重要的信息也會在異步線程中被使用到。因而,一個很天然的想法是,那不如直接把這裏獲取到的request當作參數傳到其它spawn出的子線程裏,好比:spring
@Slf4j @RestController @RequestMapping("/test") public class TestController { private static final String HEADER = "app-version"; @RequestMapping(value = "/async", method = RequestMethod.GET) public void test(HttpServletRequest request) { log.info("Main thread: " + request.getHeader(HEADER)); new Thread(() -> { log.info("Child thread: " + request.getHeader(HEADER)); }).start(); } }
在header中設置"app-version"爲1.0.1後發送 <base_url>/test/async
請求,能夠看到結果:安全
Main thread: 1.0.1Child thread: 1.0.1app
可是,坑,也就此出現了。框架
因爲 HttpServletRequest
不是線程安全的(後知後覺),當主線程完成本身的工做返回response後,相應的諸如 HttpServletRequest
等對象就會被銷燬。爲了看到這個現象,咱們能夠在子線程中多等待一段時間來保證主線程先於子線程結束。異步
@Slf4j @RestController @RequestMapping("/test") public class TestController { private static final String HEADER = "app-version"; private static final long CHILD_THREAD_WAIT_TIME = 5000; @RequestMapping(value = "/async", method = RequestMethod.GET) public void test(HttpServletRequest request) { log.info("Main thread: " + request.getHeader(HEADER)); new Thread(() -> { try { Thread.sleep(CHILD_THREAD_WAIT_TIME); } catch (Throwable e) { } log.info("Child thread: " + request.getHeader(HEADER)); }).start(); } }
在header中設置"app-version"爲1.0.1後發送 <base_url>/test/async
請求,能夠看到結果:async
Main thread: 1.0.1Child thread: nullurl
顯然,誰也沒辦法保證本身spawn出來的子線程會先於主線程結束,因此直接傳遞 HttpServletRequest
參數給子線程是不可行的。spa
網上有一種方法是經過spring框架自帶的 RequestContextHolder
來獲取request,這對異步線程來說是不可行的。由於只有在負責request處理的線程才能調用到 RequestContextHolder
對象,其它線程中它會直接爲空。線程
那麼,一個能夠想到的笨辦法是將request的值取出來,注入到自定義的對象中,而後將這個對象做爲參數傳遞給子線程:
@Slf4j @RestController @RequestMapping("/test") public class TestController { private static final String HEADER = "app-version"; private static final long MAIN_THREAD_WAIT_TIME = 0; private static final long CHILD_THREAD_WAIT_TIME = 5000; @RequestMapping(value = "/async", method = RequestMethod.GET) public void test(HttpServletRequest request) { log.info("Main thread: " + request.getHeader(HEADER)); TestVo testVo = new TestVo(request.getHeader(HEADER)); new Thread(() -> { try { Thread.sleep(CHILD_THREAD_WAIT_TIME); } catch (Throwable e) { } log.info("Child thread: " + request.getHeader(HEADER) + ", testVo = " + testVo.getAppVersion()); }).start(); try { Thread.sleep(MAIN_THREAD_WAIT_TIME); } catch (Throwable e) { } } @Data @AllArgsConstructor public static class TestVo { private String appVersion; } }
再按照"app-version"爲1.0.1發送請求後獲得:
Main thread: 1.0.1Child thread: null, testVo = 1.0.1
嗯,終於成功了。
故事彷佛到此就結束了,但若是仔細考察細節的話,有幾個問題是值得思考的:
一個合理的推理是:主線程結束時,調用了一個 destroy()
方法,這個方法主動將 HttpServletRequest
中的資源釋放,例如調用了存放header的map對應的 clear()
方法。如此,在子線程中便沒法得到以前的"app-version"所對應的value了。而TestVo因爲是用戶本身建立,必然不可能實如今 destroy()
方法中寫出釋放資源的代碼。它的值也就保存下來了。
另外,不管主線程是否調用了 destroy()
方法,真正回收的時候仍是GC的工做,這也就解釋了在子線程中不是報null exception,而只是取不到特定的key所對應的值。
進一步,咱們還能夠思考的問題是,爲何在主線程的 destoy()
方法中,不直接將request對象賦值爲null呢?
這個問題看似有些蹊蹺,而實則根本不成立。由於就算你把主線程的request變量賦值爲null時,子線程中的另外一個變量已經指向了這個request對應的內存,依舊能夠拿到相應的值。例如:
@Slf4j @RestController @RequestMapping("/test") public class TestController { private static final String HEADER = "app-version"; private static final long MAIN_THREAD_WAIT_TIME = 5000; private static final long CHILD_THREAD_WAIT_TIME = 3000; @RequestMapping(value = "/async", method = RequestMethod.GET) public void test(HttpServletRequest request) { log.info("Main thread: " + request.getHeader(HEADER)); TestVo testVo = new TestVo(request); new Thread(() -> { try { Thread.sleep(CHILD_THREAD_WAIT_TIME); } catch (Throwable e) { } log.info("Child thread: " + testVo.getRequest().getHeader(HEADER)); }).start(); request = null; try { Thread.sleep(MAIN_THREAD_WAIT_TIME); } catch (Throwable e) { } } @Data @AllArgsConstructor public static class TestVo { private HttpServletRequest request; } }
按照"app-version"爲1.0.1發送請求後獲得:
Main thread: 1.0.1Child thread: 1.0.1
這裏讓子線程等待3秒,以便主線程有充分的時間將request賦值爲null。但child線程依舊能夠拿到對應的值。
因此,將request變量賦值爲null根本沒法作到釋放資源。因此對request裏保存header的map來說,將變量賦值爲null沒法保證其它地方的引用也會一併消失。最直接有效的方法是調用 clear()
讓map中的每個元素失效。
因此總結起來是:
destroy()
方法被調用了內部map的 clear()
方法,致使沒法獲取到header的值。destroy()
方法中被釋放,因此還能繼續保持原有的值。