lgwr的兩種模式(post/wait和polling)

11.2以前,oracle的lgwr寫入模式爲post/waitphp

11.2以後新增了polling模式,能夠與post/wait模式自動切換c#

經過隱藏參數 _use_adaptive_log_file_sync 參數來控制session

查看該隱藏參數的方法:oracle

SELECT x.ksppinm NAME, y.ksppstvl VALUE, x.ksppdesc describ
  FROM SYS.x$ksppi x, SYS.x$ksppcv y
WHERE x.indx = y.indx
  AND x.ksppinm LIKE '%_use_adaptive_log_file_sync%';

當參數設置爲false時,lgwr仍是採用post/wait方式將日誌從buffer寫入磁盤ide

當參數設置爲true是,lgwr寫入方式會自動在post/wait和polling模式之間進行切換,可能會形成比較嚴重的log file sync (當使用polling模式時)post

建議關閉此參數:this

alter system set "_use_adaptive_log_file_sync"=FALSE;spa

參數當即生效,無需重啓實例。.net

 

模式切換時,lgwr的trace中會記錄相似以下的信息:日誌

RACDB1_lgwr_27890.trc-6094-Warning: log write elapsed time 649ms, size 11252KB
RACDB1_lgwr_27890.trc-6095-
RACDB1_lgwr_27890.trc-6096-*** 2016-05-10 13:28:41.481
RACDB1_lgwr_27890.trc-6097-Warning: log write elapsed time 654ms, size 16877KB
RACDB1_lgwr_27890.trc:6098:kcrfw_update_adaptive_sync_mode: post->poll long#=2 sync#=9 sync=1031 poll=1961 rw=574 ack=0 min_sleep=1961
--
RACDB1_lgwr_27890.trc-6115-Warning: log write elapsed time 532ms, size 16479KB
RACDB1_lgwr_27890.trc-6116-
RACDB1_lgwr_27890.trc-6117-*** 2016-05-10 18:22:14.255
RACDB1_lgwr_27890.trc-6118-Warning: log write elapsed time 781ms, size 316KB
RACDB1_lgwr_27890.trc:6119:kcrfw_update_adaptive_sync_mode: poll->post current_sched_delay=0 switch_sched_delay=1 current_sync_count_delta=2 switch_sync_count_delta=9
--
RACDB1_lgwr_27890.trc-6168-Warning: log write elapsed time 855ms, size 9153KB
RACDB1_lgwr_27890.trc-6169-
RACDB1_lgwr_27890.trc-6170-*** 2016-05-11 06:29:28.814
RACDB1_lgwr_27890.trc-6171-Warning: log write elapsed time 568ms, size 10345KB
RACDB1_lgwr_27890.trc:6172:kcrfw_update_adaptive_sync_mode: post->poll long#=2 sync#=7 sync=964 poll=1961 rw=969 ack=0 min_sleep=1961

 

 

兩種模式的理解:(兩種模式主體都是前臺進程,post/wait是等待lgwr通知,polling是主動輪序lgwr)

Post/wait:用戶會話被動等待LGWR通知redo寫入到log file完畢,這種方式響應速度比較快。若cpu空閒時採用這種方式能夠體驗到更好的響應時間。
Polling:用戶會話主動輪詢LGWR,觀測是否完成寫入(輪詢的間隔是10ms)。這種方式比Post/wait方式響應速度慢,但LGWR不直接把完成的消息通知到不少用戶會話,能夠節約CPU資源。若cpu繁忙時採用這種方式能夠下降cpu資源的消耗。

 

官方對兩種模式的解釋:

Adaptive Log File sync was introduced in 11.2. the feature is exactly enabled since release 11.2.0.3 , It’s enabled through an underscore parameter called _use_adaptive_log_file_sync and the description of this parameter is: adaptively switch between post/wait and polling.

Oracle can switches between the 2 methods:
Post/wait, traditional method for posting completion of writes to redo log

LGWR explicitly posts all processes waiting for the commit to complete.


The advantage of the post/wait method is that sessions should find out almost immediately when the redo has been flushed to disk.

Polling, a new method where the foreground process checks if the LGWR has completed the write.

Foreground processes sleep and poll to see if the commit is complete. The advantage of this new method is to free LGWR from having to inform many processes waiting on commit to complete thereby freeing high CPU usage by the LGWR.If post/wait is selected and the foreground processes fail to receive a post from LGWR, an incident is recorded.diagnostic traces are performed, and polling is used instead of post/wait.

Oracle uses semaphores extensively, If you look for references to 「commit」 in the Oracle docs, you’ll find the word 「post」 everywhere when they talk about communication between the foreground processes and LGWR. Now, remember that a COMMIT has two options: first, IMMEDIATE or BATCH and second, WAIT or NOWAIT. It looks like this to me:

Immediate: FG process will post to LGWR, triggering I/O (default)
Batch: FG process will not post LGWR
Wait: LGWR will post FG process when I/O is complete (default)
NoWait: LGWR will not post FG process when I/O is complete

參考:https://blog.csdn.net/rgb_rgb/article/details/72804143

相關文章
相關標籤/搜索