uWSGI的各類部署方式

時間 2019-11-18

標籤 uwsgi 各類部署方式欄目 Nginx 简体版

原文原文鏈接

As a back-end with web-server, speak the uwsgi protocol

<uwsgi id = "uwsgibk">
    <stats>127.0.0.1:9090</stats>
    <socket>127.0.0.1:3030</socket>
    <file>./server.py</file>
    <enable-threads/>
    <post-buffering/>
    <memory-report/>
</uwsgi>

As a back-end with web-server, speak the http protocol

The http and http-socket options are entirely different beasts. The first one spawns an additional process forwarding requests to a series of workers (think about it as a form of shield, at the same level of apache or nginx), while the second one sets workers to natively speak the http protocol. TL/DR: if you plan to expose uWSGI directly to the public, use –http, if you want to proxy it behind a webserver speaking http with backends, use –http-socket. .. seealso:: Native HTTP supporthtml

<uwsgi id = "httpbk">
    <stats>127.0.0.1:9090</stats>
    <http-socket>127.0.0.1:3030</http-socket>
    <file>./server.py</file>
    <enable-threads/>
    <post-buffering/>
    <memory-report/>
</uwsgi>

Expose self directly to the public

<uwsgi id = "http">
    <stats>127.0.0.1:9090</stats>
    <http>:80</http>
    <file>./server.py</file>
    <enable-threads/>
    <post-buffering/>
    <memory-report/>
</uwsgi>

Nginx with The uWSGI FastRouter

http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/Nginx.html
http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/Fastrouter.html
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21518533/putting-a-uwsgi-fast-router-in-front-of-uwsgi-servers-running-in-docker-containe
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26499644/how-to-use-the-uwsgi-fastrouter-whith-nginxnginx

Configurations of Nginxweb

location /test {
        include    uwsgi_params;
        uwsgi_pass 127.0.0.1:3030;
    }

Configurations of FastRouterdocker

<uwsgi id = "fastrouter">
    <fastrouter>127.0.0.1:3030</fastrouter>
    <fastrouter-subscription-server>127.0.0.1:3131</fastrouter-subscription-server>
    <enable-threads/>
    <master/>
    <fastrouter-stats>127.0.0.1:9595</fastrouter-stats>
</uwsgi>

Configurations of instanceapache

<uwsgi id = "subserver1">
    <stats>127.0.0.1:9393</stats>
    <processes>4</processes>
    <enable-threads/>
    <memory-report/>
    <subscribe-to>127.0.0.1:3131:[server_ip] or [domain]</subscribe-to>
    <socket>127.0.0.1:3232</socket>
    <file>./server.py</file>
    <master/>
    <weight>8</weight>
</uwsgi>

<uwsgi id = "subserver2">
    <stats>127.0.0.1:9494</stats>
    <processes>4</processes>
    <enable-threads/>
    <memory-report/>
    <subscribe-to>127.0.0.1:3131:[server_ip] or [domain]</subscribe-to>
    <socket>127.0.0.1:3333</socket>
    <file>./server.py</file>
    <master/>
    <weight>2</weight>
</uwsgi>

If we HTTP-GET [server_ip] or [domain]/test, the route of request as follows:
Nginx >> FastRouter(port 3030) >> FastRouter(port 3131) >> subserver1(port 3232) or subserver2(port 3333)
and the protocol of all is uwsgi.django

Faster Router also has specific stats.app

http router

http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/HTTP.html
Routerdom

<uwsgi id = "httprouter">
    <enable-threads/>
    <master/>
    <http>:8080</http>
    <http-stats>127.0.0.1:9090</http-stats>
    <http-to>127.0.0.1:8181</http-to>
    <http-to>127.0.0.1:8282</http-to>
</uwsgi>

sub-server1socket

<uwsgi id = "httpserver1">
    <stats>127.0.0.1:9191</stats>
    <socket>127.0.0.1:8181</socket>
    <memory-report/>
    <file>./server.py</file>
    <enable-threads/>
    <post-buffering/>
</uwsgi>

sub-server2

<uwsgi id = "httpserver2">
    <stats>127.0.0.1:9292</stats>
    <memory-report/>
    <file>./server.py</file>
    <socket>127.0.0.1:8282</socket>
    <enable-threads/>
    <post-buffering/>
</uwsgi>

Other route mode

Just like Fast Route and Http Route, the router can forward(http-to) or route requests to other sub-servers, the only difference is protocol.
The protocols as follows:
Fast, HTTP(S), raw, ssl.
Certainly, all of routers have specific stats in the same style.

The uWSGI Emperor

http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/Emperor.html
Emperor

<uwsgi id = "emperor">
    <emperor>./vassals</emperor>
    <emperor-stats-server>127.0.0.1:9090</emperor-stats-server>
</uwsgi>

Vassal1

<vassal1>
    <uwsgi id = "vassal1">
        <http>:8080</http>
        <stats>127.0.0.1:9191</stats>
        <memory-report/>
        <enable-threads/>
        <post-buffering/>
        <file>./server.py</file>
        <chdir>..</chdir>
    </uwsgi>
</vassal1>

Vassal2

<vassal2>
    <uwsgi id = "vassal2">
        <http>:8181</http>
        <stats>127.0.0.1:9292</stats>
        <memory-report/>
        <enable-threads/>
        <post-buffering/>
        <file>./server.py</file>
        <chdir>..</chdir>
    </uwsgi>
</vassal2>

Emperor also has specific stats.

multi-mountpoint

<uwsgi id = "vassal1">
    <socket>127.0.0.1:3030</socket>
    <http>:8080</http>
    <stats>127.0.0.1:9191</stats>
    <memory-report/>
    <enable-threads/>
    <post-buffering/>
    <manage-script-name/>
    <chdir>..</chdir>
    <mount>/pic=server.py</mount>
    <mount>/test=fuck.py</mount>
    <workers>2</workers>
</uwsgi>

注意：

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19475651/how-to-mount-django-app-with-uwsgi

<manage-script-name/>參數很關鍵，但官方help中並無提這個，F*CK YOU！

這樣配置後，uWSGI會根據不一樣的request路徑調用不一樣的app。

The End

uWSGI做爲backend，和Nginx的配合比Apache要好，建議用Nginx做前端。

若是在CentOS上以INET socket爲載體部署Nginx+uWSGI或Apache+uWSGI時，客戶端訪問遇到50x Bad Gateway錯誤時，強烈建議你換到Ubuntu上去試試，由於一樣的配置在CentOS上有這個問題，換到Ubuntu後就可能沒問題。

2014-11-03補充：CentOS下的這個問題的緣由是RedHat系列的Linux發行版默認開啓SELinux，SELinux的某些策略致使的這個問題，不知道算不算是BUG。關閉了SELinux就可解決，具體如何關閉能夠參考：http://www.cnblogs.com/lightnear/archive/2012/10/06/2713090.html。Debian系列的發行版由於默認沒有開啓SELinux，因此不存在這個問題。上週末看到一篇比較Liunx發行版性能的文章時，偶然發現的有SELinux這個東西，今天一試果真。若是再碰到其餘相似的詭異問題，也能夠嘗試關閉SELinux試試。

若是用Apache+uWSGI部署後，客戶端訪問時返回一個文件，那有多是Apache對頁面壓縮後的結果，把Apache的GZIP壓縮模塊關掉就行了。Nginx沒有這個問題，更好用不是嗎？