//第1種寫法 function Circle(r) { this.r = r; } Circle.PI = 3.14159; Circle.prototype.area = function() { return Circle.PI * this.r * this.r; } var c = new Circle(1.0); alert(c.area());
//第2種寫法 var Circle = function() { var obj = new Object(); obj.PI = 3.14159; obj.area = function( r ) { return this.PI * r * r; } return obj; } var c = new Circle(); alert( c.area( 1.0 ) );
//第3種寫法 var Circle = new Object(); Circle.PI = 3.14159; Circle.Area = function( r ) { return this.PI * r * r; } alert( Circle.Area( 1.0 ) );
//第4種寫法 var Circle={ "PI":3.14159, "area":function(r){ return this.PI * r * r; } }; alert( Circle.area(1.0) );
//第5種寫法 var Circle = new Function("this.PI = 3.14159;this.area = function( r ) {return r*r*this.PI;}"); alert( (new Circle()).area(1.0) );
第四種,代碼量少點。JSON在傳遞時更靈活。可是在this的綁定上有些狀況會有問題this
第一種, 對像的封裝看起來比較流暢.易讀.《JavaScript高級程序設計》裏面也推薦第一種。spa