10 個提高效率的Linux小技巧

一、LIMIT 語句

分頁查詢是最經常使用的場景之一,但也一般也是最容易出問題的地方。好比對於下面簡單的語句,通常 DBA 想到的辦法是在 type, name, create_time 字段上加組合索引。這樣條件排序都能有效的利用到索引,性能迅速提高。前端

SELECT * 
FROM   operation 
WHERE  type = 'SQLStats' 
       AND name = 'SlowLog' 
ORDER  BY create_time 
LIMIT  1000, 10;

好吧,可能 90% 以上的 DBA 解決該問題就到此爲止。但當 LIMIT 子句變成 「LIMIT 1000000,10」 時,程序員仍然會抱怨:我只取 10 條記錄爲何仍是慢?mysql

要知道數據庫也並不知道第 1000000 條記錄從什麼地方開始,即便有索引也須要從頭計算一次。出現這種性能問題,多數情形下是程序員偷懶了。程序員

在前端數據瀏覽翻頁,或者大數據分批導出等場景下,是能夠將上一頁的最大值當成參數做爲查詢條件的。SQL 從新設計以下:面試

SELECT   * 
FROM     operation 
WHERE    type = 'SQLStats' 
AND      name = 'SlowLog' 
AND      create_time > '2017-03-16 14:00:00' 
ORDER BY create_time limit 10;

在新設計下查詢時間基本固定,不會隨着數據量的增加而發生變化。算法

二、隱式轉換

SQL 語句中查詢變量和字段定義類型不匹配是另外一個常見的錯誤。好比下面的語句:sql

mysql> explain extended SELECT * 
     > FROM   my_balance b 
     > WHERE  b.bpn = 14000000123 
     >       AND b.isverified IS NULL ;
mysql> show warnings;
| Warning | 1739 | Cannot use ref access on index 'bpn' due to type or collation conversion on field 'bpn'

其中字段 bpn 的定義爲 varchar(20),MySQL 的策略是將字符串轉換爲數字以後再比較。函數做用於表字段,索引失效。數據庫

上述狀況多是應用程序框架自動填入的參數,而不是程序員的原意。如今應用框架不少很繁雜,使用方便的同時也當心它可能給本身挖坑。app

三、關聯更新、刪除

雖然 MySQL5.6 引入了物化特性,但須要特別注意它目前僅僅針對查詢語句的優化。對於更新或刪除須要手工重寫成 JOIN。框架

好比下面 UPDATE 語句,MySQL 實際執行的是循環 / 嵌套子查詢(DEPENDENT SUBQUERY),其執行時間可想而知。函數

UPDATE operation o 
SET    status = 'applying' 
WHERE  o.id IN (SELECT id 
                FROM   (SELECT o.id, 
                               o.status 
                        FROM   operation o 
                        WHERE  o.group = 123 
                               AND o.status NOT IN ( 'done' ) 
                        ORDER  BY o.parent, 
                                  o.id 
                        LIMIT  1) t);

執行計劃:

+----+--------------------+-------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type        | table | type  | possible_keys | key     | key_len | ref   | rows | Extra                                               |
+----+--------------------+-------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+
| 1  | PRIMARY            | o     | index |               | PRIMARY | 8       |       | 24   | Using where; Using temporary                        |
| 2  | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY |       |       |               |         |         |       |      | Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables |
| 3  | DERIVED            | o     | ref   | idx_2,idx_5   | idx_5   | 8       | const | 1    | Using where; Using filesort                         |
+----+--------------------+-------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+

重寫爲 JOIN 以後,子查詢的選擇模式從 DEPENDENT SUBQUERY 變成 DERIVED,執行速度大大加快,從 7 秒下降到 2 毫秒

UPDATE operation o 
       JOIN  (SELECT o.id, 
                            o.status 
                     FROM   operation o 
                     WHERE  o.group = 123 
                            AND o.status NOT IN ( 'done' ) 
                     ORDER  BY o.parent, 
                               o.id 
                     LIMIT  1) t
         ON o.id = t.id 
SET    status = 'applying'

執行計劃簡化爲:

+----+-------------+-------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key   | key_len | ref   | rows | Extra                                               |
+----+-------------+-------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+
| 1  | PRIMARY     |       |      |               |       |         |       |      | Impossible WHERE noticed after reading const tables |
| 2  | DERIVED     | o     | ref  | idx_2,idx_5   | idx_5 | 8       | const | 1    | Using where; Using filesort                         |
+----+-------------+-------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+-----------------------------------------------------+

四、混合排序

MySQL 不能利用索引進行混合排序。但在某些場景,仍是有機會使用特殊方法提高性能的。

SELECT * 
FROM   my_order o 
       INNER JOIN my_appraise a ON a.orderid = o.id 
ORDER  BY a.is_reply ASC, 
          a.appraise_time DESC 
LIMIT  0, 20

執行計劃顯示爲全表掃描:

+----+-------------+-------+--------+-------------+---------+---------+---------------+---------+-+
| id | select_type | table | type   | possible_keys     | key     | key_len | ref      | rows    | Extra    
+----+-------------+-------+--------+-------------+---------+---------+---------------+---------+-+
|  1 | SIMPLE      | a     | ALL    | idx_orderid | NULL    | NULL    | NULL    | 1967647 | Using filesort |
|  1 | SIMPLE      | o     | eq_ref | PRIMARY     | PRIMARY | 122     | a.orderid |       1 | NULL           |
+----+-------------+-------+--------+---------+---------+---------+-----------------+---------+-+

因爲 is_reply 只有 0 和 1 兩種狀態,咱們按照下面的方法重寫後,執行時間從 1.58 秒下降到 2 毫秒。

SELECT * 
FROM   ((SELECT *
         FROM   my_order o 
                INNER JOIN my_appraise a 
                        ON a.orderid = o.id 
                           AND is_reply = 0 
         ORDER  BY appraise_time DESC 
         LIMIT  0, 20) 
        UNION ALL 
        (SELECT *
         FROM   my_order o 
                INNER JOIN my_appraise a 
                        ON a.orderid = o.id 
                           AND is_reply = 1 
         ORDER  BY appraise_time DESC 
         LIMIT  0, 20)) t 
ORDER  BY  is_reply ASC, 
          appraisetime DESC 
LIMIT  20;

五、EXISTS語句

MySQL 對待 EXISTS 子句時,仍然採用嵌套子查詢的執行方式。以下面的 SQL 語句:

SELECT *
FROM   my_neighbor n 
       LEFT JOIN my_neighbor_apply sra 
              ON n.id = sra.neighbor_id 
                 AND sra.user_id = 'xxx' 
WHERE  n.topic_status < 4 
       AND EXISTS(SELECT 1 
                  FROM   message_info m 
                  WHERE  n.id = m.neighbor_id 
                         AND m.inuser = 'xxx') 
       AND n.topic_type <> 5

執行計劃爲:

+----+--------------------+-------+------+-----+------------------------------------------+---------+-------+---------+ -----+
| id | select_type        | table | type | possible_keys     | key   | key_len | ref   | rows    | Extra   |
+----+--------------------+-------+------+ -----+------------------------------------------+---------+-------+---------+ -----+
|  1 | PRIMARY            | n     | ALL  |  | NULL     | NULL    | NULL  | 1086041 | Using where                   |
|  1 | PRIMARY            | sra   | ref  |  | idx_user_id | 123     | const |       1 | Using where          |
|  2 | DEPENDENT SUBQUERY | m     | ref  |  | idx_message_info   | 122     | const |       1 | Using index condition; Using where |
+----+--------------------+-------+------+ -----+------------------------------------------+---------+-------+---------+ -----+

去掉 exists 更改成 join,可以避免嵌套子查詢,將執行時間從 1.93 秒下降爲 1 毫秒。

SELECT *
FROM   my_neighbor n 
       INNER JOIN message_info m 
               ON n.id = m.neighbor_id 
                  AND m.inuser = 'xxx' 
       LEFT JOIN my_neighbor_apply sra 
              ON n.id = sra.neighbor_id 
                 AND sra.user_id = 'xxx' 
WHERE  n.topic_status < 4 
       AND n.topic_type <> 5

新的執行計劃:

+----+-------------+-------+--------+ -----+------------------------------------------+---------+ -----+------+ -----+
| id | select_type | table | type   | possible_keys     | key       | key_len | ref   | rows | Extra                 |
+----+-------------+-------+--------+ -----+------------------------------------------+---------+ -----+------+ -----+
|  1 | SIMPLE      | m     | ref    | | idx_message_info   | 122     | const    |    1 | Using index condition |
|  1 | SIMPLE      | n     | eq_ref | | PRIMARY   | 122     | ighbor_id |    1 | Using where      |
|  1 | SIMPLE      | sra   | ref    | | idx_user_id | 123     | const     |    1 | Using where           |
+----+-------------+-------+--------+ -----+------------------------------------------+---------+ -----+------+ -----+

六、條件下推

外部查詢條件不可以下推到複雜的視圖或子查詢的狀況有:

  • 聚合子查詢;

  • 含有 LIMIT 的子查詢;

  • UNION 或 UNION ALL 子查詢;

  • 輸出字段中的子查詢;

以下面的語句,從執行計劃能夠看出其條件做用於聚合子查詢以後

SELECT * 
FROM   (SELECT target, 
               Count(*) 
        FROM   operation 
        GROUP  BY target) t 
WHERE  target = 'rm-xxxx'
+----+-------------+------------+-------+---------------+-------------+---------+-------+------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table      | type  | possible_keys | key         | key_len | ref   | rows | Extra       |
+----+-------------+------------+-------+---------------+-------------+---------+-------+------+-------------+
|  1 | PRIMARY     | <derived2> | ref   | <auto_key0>   | <auto_key0> | 514     | const |    2 | Using where |
|  2 | DERIVED     | operation  | index | idx_4         | idx_4       | 519     | NULL  |   20 | Using index |
+----+-------------+------------+-------+---------------+-------------+---------+-------+------+-------------+

肯定從語義上查詢條件能夠直接下推後,重寫以下:

SELECT target, 
       Count(*) 
FROM   operation 
WHERE  target = 'rm-xxxx' 
GROUP  BY target

執行計劃變爲:

+----+-------------+-----------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+--------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+----+-------------+-----------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+--------------------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | operation | ref | idx_4 | idx_4 | 514 | const | 1 | Using where; Using index |
+----+-------------+-----------+------+---------------+-------+---------+-------+------+--------------------+

七、提早縮小範圍

先上初始 SQL 語句:

SELECT * 
FROM   my_order o 
       LEFT JOIN my_userinfo u 
              ON o.uid = u.uid
       LEFT JOIN my_productinfo p 
              ON o.pid = p.pid 
WHERE  ( o.display = 0 ) 
       AND ( o.ostaus = 1 ) 
ORDER  BY o.selltime DESC 
LIMIT  0, 15

該 SQL 語句原意是:先作一系列的左鏈接,而後排序取前 15 條記錄。從執行計劃也能夠看出,最後一步估算排序記錄數爲 90 萬,時間消耗爲 12 秒。

+----+-------------+-------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-----------------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | type   | possible_keys | key     | key_len | ref             | rows   | Extra                                              |
+----+-------------+-------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-----------------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+
|  1 | SIMPLE      | o     | ALL    | NULL          | NULL    | NULL    | NULL            | 909119 | Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort       |
|  1 | SIMPLE      | u     | eq_ref | PRIMARY       | PRIMARY | 4       | o.uid |      1 | NULL                                               |
|  1 | SIMPLE      | p     | ALL    | PRIMARY       | NULL    | NULL    | NULL            |      6 | Using where; Using join buffer (Block Nested Loop) |
+----+-------------+-------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-----------------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+

因爲最後 WHERE 條件以及排序均針對最左主表,所以能夠先對 my_order 排序提早縮小數據量再作左鏈接。SQL 重寫後以下,執行時間縮小爲 1 毫秒左右。

SELECT * 
FROM (
SELECT * 
FROM   my_order o 
WHERE  ( o.display = 0 ) 
       AND ( o.ostaus = 1 ) 
ORDER  BY o.selltime DESC 
LIMIT  0, 15
) o 
     LEFT JOIN my_userinfo u 
              ON o.uid = u.uid 
     LEFT JOIN my_productinfo p 
              ON o.pid = p.pid 
ORDER BY  o.selltime DESC
limit 0, 15

再檢查執行計劃:子查詢物化後(select_type=DERIVED) 參與 JOIN。雖然估算行掃描仍然爲 90 萬,可是利用了索引以及 LIMIT 子句後,實際執行時間變得很小。

+----+-------------+------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table      | type   | possible_keys | key     | key_len | ref   | rows   | Extra                                              |
+----+-------------+------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+
|  1 | PRIMARY     | <derived2> | ALL    | NULL          | NULL    | NULL    | NULL  |     15 | Using temporary; Using filesort                    |
|  1 | PRIMARY     | u          | eq_ref | PRIMARY       | PRIMARY | 4       | o.uid |      1 | NULL                                               |
|  1 | PRIMARY     | p          | ALL    | PRIMARY       | NULL    | NULL    | NULL  |      6 | Using where; Using join buffer (Block Nested Loop) |
|  2 | DERIVED     | o          | index  | NULL          | idx_1   | 5       | NULL  | 909112 | Using where                                        |
+----+-------------+------------+--------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+--------+----------------------------------------------------+

八、中間結果集下推

再來看下面這個已經初步優化過的例子 (左鏈接中的主表優先做用查詢條件):

SELECT    a.*, 
          c.allocated 
FROM      ( 
              SELECT   resourceid 
              FROM     my_distribute d 
                   WHERE    isdelete = 0 
                   AND      cusmanagercode = '1234567' 
                   ORDER BY salecode limit 20) a 
LEFT JOIN 
          ( 
              SELECT   resourcesid, sum(ifnull(allocation, 0) * 12345) allocated 
              FROM     my_resources 
                   GROUP BY resourcesid) c 
ON        a.resourceid = c.resourcesid

那麼該語句還存在其它問題嗎?不難看出子查詢 c 是全表聚合查詢,在表數量特別大的狀況下會致使整個語句的性能降低。

其實對於子查詢 c,左鏈接最後結果集只關心能和主表 resourceid 能匹配的數據。所以咱們能夠重寫語句以下,執行時間從原來的 2 秒降低到 2 毫秒。

SELECT    a.*, 
          c.allocated 
FROM      ( 
                   SELECT   resourceid 
                   FROM     my_distribute d 
                   WHERE    isdelete = 0 
                   AND      cusmanagercode = '1234567' 
                   ORDER BY salecode limit 20) a 
LEFT JOIN 
          ( 
                   SELECT   resourcesid, sum(ifnull(allocation, 0) * 12345) allocated 
                   FROM     my_resources r, 
                            ( 
                                     SELECT   resourceid 
                                     FROM     my_distribute d 
                                     WHERE    isdelete = 0 
                                     AND      cusmanagercode = '1234567' 
                                     ORDER BY salecode limit 20) a 
                   WHERE    r.resourcesid = a.resourcesid 
                   GROUP BY resourcesid) c 
ON        a.resourceid = c.resourcesid

可是子查詢 a 在咱們的 SQL 語句中出現了屢次。這種寫法不只存在額外的開銷,還使得整個語句顯的繁雜。使用 WITH 語句再次重寫:

WITH a AS 
( 
         SELECT   resourceid 
         FROM     my_distribute d 
         WHERE    isdelete = 0 
         AND      cusmanagercode = '1234567' 
         ORDER BY salecode limit 20)
SELECT    a.*, 
          c.allocated 
FROM      a 
LEFT JOIN 
          ( 
                   SELECT   resourcesid, sum(ifnull(allocation, 0) * 12345) allocated 
                   FROM     my_resources r, 
                            a 
                   WHERE    r.resourcesid = a.resourcesid 
                   GROUP BY resourcesid) c 
ON        a.resourceid = c.resourcesid

數據庫編譯器產生執行計劃,決定着 SQL 的實際執行方式。可是編譯器只是盡力服務,全部數據庫的編譯器都不是盡善盡美的。

上述提到的多數場景,在其它數據庫中也存在性能問題。瞭解數據庫編譯器的特性,才能避規其短處,寫出高性能的 SQL 語句。

程序員在設計數據模型以及編寫 SQL 語句時,要把算法的思想或意識帶進來。

編寫複雜 SQL 語句要養成使用 WITH 語句的習慣。簡潔且思路清晰的 SQL 語句也能減少數據庫的負擔 。


「不積跬步,無以致千里」,但願將來的你能:有夢爲馬 隨處可棲!加油,少年!

關注公衆號:「Java 知己」,天天更新Java知識哦,期待你的到來!

  • 發送「Group」,與 10 萬程序員一塊兒進步。
  • 發送「面試」,領取BATJ面試資料、面試視頻攻略。
  • 發送「玩轉算法」,領取《玩轉算法》系列視頻教程。
  • 千萬不要發送「1024」...
    每日福利
相關文章
相關標籤/搜索